Skip to content

Better pitch / f0 tracking #234

Description

@turian

I see that your fork is very interested in improved f0/pitch tracking.

See my comment on the original repo, RVC-Project#2373, where I write:

Consider using the pitch trackers from penn which might be higher quality.

NOTES:

  • Use the dev branch of that repo, according to their README.
  • The paper shows that FCNF0++ and DeepF0++ are almost equally good, without must statistical difference detected in their experiments.

[edit: I seem to recall that DeepF0++ uses less memory than FCNF0++, but it's worth checking this again]

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions