Skip to content

Documentation Platform Evaluation #276

Description

@botanical

In order to improve our veda-docs site and maintenance of our docs, we should explore alternatives to Quarto.

Acceptance Criteria

  • assess if an alternative to Quarto (MKdocs, Sphinx, Jekyll site, etc.) is more appropriate for the veda-docs site - ADR required (in veda-architecture)
  • define evaluation criteria (Ease of contribution via GitHub, native support for Jupyter notebooks, theming, navigation, extensibility)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions