catalog/drawtabs/xppen/xppen-pen-displays.md has a row for Artist 11 GEN2.
It was carrying model ID MD220FH, which belongs to the Artist 22 Plus — an 11-inch tablet cannot share a 22-inch model number. That wrong ID has been removed (commit ce6ee34d), leaving the Model column blank.
It was not replaced, because no Artist 11 and no CD110-series model ID exists anywhere in the DrawTab Data Explorer tablet data. The naming pattern in the surrounding rows makes CD110FH look like the obvious answer (CD100FH, CD120FH, CD130FH, CD160FH) — but writing in a model ID that no source confirms would put an invented model number in the catalog people consult specifically to avoid that.
So the question is whether the row should be there at all:
- If the Artist 11 GEN2 is a real product, it needs its actual model ID and a Year.
- If it is not, the row should be removed.
Also in this table: Artist 22 GEN2's Year is 2021 here, but the Data Explorer says 2020. One of the two is wrong.
catalog/drawtabs/xppen/xppen-pen-displays.mdhas a row for Artist 11 GEN2.It was carrying model ID MD220FH, which belongs to the Artist 22 Plus — an 11-inch tablet cannot share a 22-inch model number. That wrong ID has been removed (commit ce6ee34d), leaving the Model column blank.
It was not replaced, because no Artist 11 and no CD110-series model ID exists anywhere in the DrawTab Data Explorer tablet data. The naming pattern in the surrounding rows makes
CD110FHlook like the obvious answer (CD100FH, CD120FH, CD130FH, CD160FH) — but writing in a model ID that no source confirms would put an invented model number in the catalog people consult specifically to avoid that.So the question is whether the row should be there at all:
Also in this table: Artist 22 GEN2's Year is 2021 here, but the Data Explorer says 2020. One of the two is wrong.