score_lifecycle_health: Provide MwLifeCycleManagerMock for OSS consumers

[akritisingh1109]

What

main_function_UT fails to compile because it depends on MwLifeCycleManagerMock, which does not exist in the score_lifecycle_health

score_lifecycle_health needs to provide MwLifeCycleManagerMock — that intercepts score::mw::lifecycle::LifeCycleManager::report_running(), report_shutdown(), constructor and destructor via global GMock callbacks, plus a corresponding Bazel target.

Acceptance Criteria (DoD)

score::mw::lifecycle::MwLifeCycleManagerMock class is available in score_lifecycle_health

A corresponding Bazel target (e.g. mw_lifecycle_mock) is declared

How

No response

[NicolasFussberger]

Hi @akritisingh1109,
there is already LifecycleManagerMock. Is this maybe an equivalent class to what you are looking for?
I cannot access the links in the description.

[akritisingh1109]

Hi @NicolasFussberger , i am talking about mwlifecyclemanagermock , main_function_UT includes mwlifecyclemanagermock which we don't have in SCORE

also could you please try to access the link again?

[NicolasFussberger]

Okay, I get it now that mwlifecyclemanagermock is a different class. I wondered if it just had been renamed.
Seems this was not part of the mocks that were originally introduced here https://github.com/eclipse-score/lifecycle/pull/78/changes

[akritisingh1109]

you're right, MwLifeCycleManagerMock was never introduced in that PR.

The root cause is that lifecycle_mock's lifecyclemanagermock.cpp redefines LifeCycleManager::run() and internally calls report_running() and report_shutdown() — but neither of these is defined in the lifecycle_mock target (it doesn't link lifecyclemanager.cpp). This causes an undefined symbol linker error.

MwLifeCycleManagerMock is needed to provide mock definitions for report_running() and report_shutdown() that route through GMock callbacks, preventing both the linker error and real IPC calls to the Launch Manager during unit tests.