Skip to content

Write only the first marker pair - #6

Merged
kanywst merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
first-marker-only
Oct 14, 2026
Merged

kanywst merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
first-marker-only

Conversation

@kanywst

@kanywst kanywst commented Oct 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

#4 put the markers in a setup example in the README. The script replaced every pair, so the next entry (#5) also wrote the table into the example. It now replaces the first pair only, and the example is back to two empty markers.

Checked by running the script on a copy of this README: the entry lands once, in the real table, and the example block is unchanged.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 49fe9eef-8def-4446-b893-c8c0ea66464d
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@claude

claude Bot commented Oct 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No findings. count=1 targets the first marker pair (the real book, README.md:7-22), and the emptied setup example (README.md:41-42) matches "The first entry fills in the table."

@kanywst
kanywst merged commit 8d9840f into main Oct 14, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant