Skip to content

Joint alignment x class difficulty conditioning - #171

Merged
10d9e merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
improve/alignment-class-difficulty
Jul 2, 2026
Merged

10d9e merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
improve/alignment-class-difficulty

Conversation

@10d9e

@10d9e 10d9e commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Model

fable 5

Approach

Second joint conditioning in the difficulty family, the binary-oriented sibling of column x class (PR #170): a 43rd layer-1 specialist keyed on the surprise EMA conditioned on the (word phase pos mod 8, byte class) PAIR — 32 EMAs, keyed level x joint regime (512 rows). An operand byte following an opcode-class byte at phase 3 is a different predictability regime than the same byte class at phase 0, which the marginal alignment (PR #165/#166) and class (PR #153) conditionings each average away. Gains led exactly where designed: binary_mozilla 227687->227648 plus source. Local SCORE 568752 -> 568715 (-37). 9/9 round-trip lossless; only src/algorithm/ touched.

Validation

bash scripts/evaluate.sh passed locally; only src/algorithm/ changed.
Local SCORE: 568715 (Scorekeeper recomputes after merge).

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CI verification passed ✅

Boundary guard and required PR metadata checks passed.

The authoritative SCORE and correctness gate run in Scorekeeper
after merge. Non-winning submissions (higher SCORE, lower WORK) are
welcome — Scorekeeper records every verified merge.

WORK: 14062093486 (deterministic, init-free wasm operators for 4096 bytes; lower is faster) — deterministic complexity preview (wasm fuel, non-gating).

Auto-merge will run via Auto-merge workflow (default GITHUB_TOKEN).
Scorekeeper will append the verified entry to RESULTS.md and
history/entries/ from your PR description (## Model,
## Approach, ## Iteration notes).

@10d9e
10d9e merged commit 19c5c7f into main Jul 2, 2026
1 check passed
@10d9e
10d9e deleted the improve/alignment-class-difficulty branch July 2, 2026 22:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant