Skip to content

Placement settings custom versioning - #348

Merged
pawelbaran merged 1 commit into
developfrom
Revit_ElementRelationships_Tool-#269-ERTweaks
Sep 9, 2026
Merged

pawelbaran merged 1 commit into
developfrom
Revit_ElementRelationships_Tool-#269-ERTweaks

Conversation

@michal-pekacki

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

NOTE: Depends on

Issues addressed by this PR

Closes #

Added custom versioning for BH.Revit.oM.ElementRelationships.ElementPlacementSettings

Test files

Changelog

Additional comments

@michal-pekacki michal-pekacki self-assigned this Sep 2, 2026
@michal-pekacki michal-pekacki added the type:compliance Non-conforming to code guidelines label Sep 2, 2026

@pawelbaran pawelbaran left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving on the basis of the passing Bot versioning check. @sakanni you may be interested in checking why did the CI versioning check fail though

@bhombot-ci

bhombot-ci Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@michal-pekacki just to let you know, I have provided a check-versioning result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @michal-pekacki on Revit_ElementRelationships_Tool

@sakanni

sakanni commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Red ci-versioning is known one on this repo specifically, nothing to do with the change here, and it's not a required check. Good to merge.

@pawelbaran
pawelbaran merged commit 40a1ad2 into develop Sep 9, 2026
53 of 59 checks passed
@pawelbaran
pawelbaran deleted the Revit_ElementRelationships_Tool-#269-ERTweaks branch September 9, 2026 09:25
@BHoMBot BHoMBot mentioned this pull request Sep 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type:compliance Non-conforming to code guidelines

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants