🎨 Palette: aria-disabled 중복 속성 제거

[seonghobae]

Current authority — 2026-09-23 KST

• canonical accessibility owner/base: fix(a11y): remove redundant aria-disabled from native disabled buttons #1676 8a3ac51662fbe8e49f26a317ac0afe85f853c9ac
• canonical owner tree: 44359ea501bbe94e8a82aa1deb8e34e4b2c514b2
• canonical prerequisite: fix(deps): patch frontend audit security floors #1623 509be4c1d9b6c7ba239a108656e2382681a85341
• generated predecessor: 61cdd39f952e3a218552c4cdadd8091d5eef7296 (direct develop)
• prior zero-effective-delta repair: 52c3ebc8e875f89a88f618e42836c8852048680c
• ordinary/non-force descendant restack / exact current head: 262c9bb7d44209f9ada967f4f0e9039951e3b6a1
• fresh compare fix(a11y): remove redundant aria-disabled from native disabled buttons #1676 → current: ahead 8 / behind 0 / zero changed files
• lifecycle: Draft / generated zero-effective-delta provenance / do not merge independently

The generated proposal removes aria-disabled from the same native disabled Settings buttons already owned by #1676. Canonical #1676 owns the HTML disabled semantics, independent aria-busy state, focused regression and standards doctoring. The generated Palette doctrine is not a second product/accessibility authority.

This provenance branch had previously converged to #1676's causal product tree, but canonical #1676 later advanced through two source-neutral descendants to exact 8a3ac516.... Before this repair the branch was therefore stale by ancestry: fresh compare against current #1676 was ahead 7 / behind 2, despite zero file delta.

262c9bb7... preserves the prior provenance head as first parent, ordinary-adopts exact current #1676 as an additional parent, and points to the exact canonical owner tree. The branch moved by non-force fast-forward. Fresh compare is now ahead-only, behind 0, with zero effective file delta.

Historical direct-develop workflows, generated provenance receipts and #1676 predecessor receipts do not transfer. Product acceptance remains on #1676, including current-head hosted evidence, independent review and browser/keyboard/responsive verification.

Keep Draft until #1676 normally integrates or a verified complete successor inherits source, regression, doctoring and evidence. No duplicate Settings writer, dependency ownership change from this lane, source-neutral wake commit, stale receipt transfer, self-approval, force push/destructive rebase, synthetic status or gate weakening.

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

• Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch ux/remove-redundant-aria-disabled-16122597254351250230

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[seonghobae]

Closing: this change has no effective or measurable impact, so it isn't worth the review and CI cost. Thanks!

[google-labs-jules]

Closing: this change has no effective or measurable impact, so it isn't worth the review and CI cost. Thanks!

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.