ENG-2119 Document the mapping between CrossApp types and the Concept table - #1290
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
This pull request has been ignored for the connected project Preview Branches by Supabase. |
![devin-ai-integration[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/811515?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![graphite-app[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/158384?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
85ccb9f to
5c1d335
Compare
With fixes from Claude, Devin and Graphite
5c1d335 to
6c633fb
Compare
|
@codex review |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: a20b72b2c4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| | CrossAppNodeSchema | Content | value | | ||
| | ------------------ | ----------------------------------- | ----- | | ||
| | `label` | `name`, `literal_content->label` | {} | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When a CrossAppNodeSchema is converted by crossAppNodeSchemaToDbConcept, label is assigned only to name; its literal_content is built solely from template and template_content. Consequently, group-published schemas converted through this path do not have literal_content->label, so consumers relying on the documented mapping will fail to find it.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
|
||
| | CrossAppNodeSchema | Content | value | | ||
| | ------------------ | ----------------------------------- | ----- | | ||
| | `label` | `name`, `literal_content->label` | {} | |
mdroidian
left a comment
mdroidian
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'll approve, but there are two changes required still
- change
DiscourseGraphtoDiscourse Graph - address the new graphite comment
|
|
||
| ### Use cases | ||
|
|
||
| Having ObjectProperties makes it possible to represent certain special cases of DiscourseGraphs, such as the necessary relation between Evidence and Source. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's please change this to Discourse Graph
2 participants
https://linear.app/discourse-graphs/issue/ENG-2119/document-the-mapping-between-crossapp-types-and-the-concept-table
This is documentation, I really think it does not need a Loom demo.