Skip to content

Fix quantum-dimension weighting in dot - #288

Merged
mtfishman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
mf/dot-quantum-dimension
Oct 7, 2026
Merged

mtfishman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
mf/dot-quantum-dimension

Conversation

@mtfishman

@mtfishman mtfishman commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Restore quantum-dimension weighting in dot so non-abelian tensors agree with their norms at every codomain/domain split.

Delegate to the matrix inner product so sector arrays supply their coupled sector quantum dimension.
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.57%. Comparing base (a56728d) to head (311fde1).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #288      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.53%   85.57%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          40       40              
  Lines        2820     2815       -5     
==========================================
- Hits         2412     2409       -3     
+ Misses        408      406       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 18.64% <0.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mtfishman mtfishman changed the title [WIP] Fix quantum-dimension weighting in dot Fix quantum-dimension weighting in dot Oct 7, 2026
@mtfishman
mtfishman marked this pull request as ready for review October 7, 2026 22:11
@mtfishman
mtfishman merged commit 61e08d1 into main Oct 7, 2026
17 of 18 checks passed
@mtfishman
mtfishman deleted the mf/dot-quantum-dimension branch October 7, 2026 22:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant