Skip to content

Wait for the lab review sheet to stop sliding before measuring - #1091

Merged
MBombeck merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/e2e-lab-review-animations
Oct 2, 2026
Merged

MBombeck merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/e2e-lab-review-animations

Conversation

@MBombeck

@MBombeck MBombeck commented Oct 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Follow-up to #1088, which did not cure the flake: the 560 px and 390 px cases of the lab-scan review spec still failed on the first attempt (#1087, #1086). On a phone and a small tablet the review sheet slides up from the bottom; its width settles before the slide ends, so the width-only wait passed at once and the spec still compared field positions from different frames. It now awaits every running animation (document.getAnimations()) and then requires the surface's width and y position to hold across two frames. No product change.

…ring

On a phone and a small tablet the review sheet slides up from the bottom;
its width settles before the slide ends, so waiting on width alone still
compared fields from different frames. The spec now waits for every
running animation to finish and for the surface to hold its position and
width across two frames.
…s row

The spec compared field tops within 8 px. A field label that wraps onto a
second line, which depends on the runner's font metrics, moves that
field's input down by one line while it stays in the same row, and the
560 px case failed on it. A field is now beside the value when it sits to
its right and starts above the value's bottom edge.
@MBombeck
MBombeck merged commit 06f69e4 into main Oct 2, 2026
25 checks passed
@MBombeck
MBombeck deleted the fix/e2e-lab-review-animations branch October 2, 2026 21:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant