ForceFreeStates/Tearing - API! - Pose inner-layer matching and tearing as problems solved on the published result by matt-pharr · Pull Request #507 · OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC

matt-pharr · 2026-10-06T12:41:29Z

Release note

Audience: users
Numerical impact: matched outputs move ≤ 1.2e-10 (round-off) (harness @ 289f6ea)
Migration: see below

Matching and tearing are now problems solved on a finished force-free-states result.

using GeneralizedPerturbedEquilibrium

# Equilibrium, then the kinetic profiles the inner layer reads η, ρ and rotation from
eq = PlasmaEquilibrium("TkMkr_D3Dlike_Hmode.geqdsk"; jac_type="hamada", grid_type="ldp",
    psilow=1e-4, psihigh=0.993, mpsi=128, mtheta=256)
attach_kinetic_profiles!(eq, "TkMkr_D3Dlike_Hmode_kinetic.h5")

# Force-free states; matching needs the coil-response block (rpec_flag)
prob = EulerLagrangeProblem(eq; nn=1, delta_mlow=8, delta_mhigh=4, qlow=1.02, set_psilim_via_dmlim=false)
ffs = solve(prob, Galerkin(; pfac=0.03, rpec_flag=true, cut_solution=true))

# Driven matching with the GGJ inner layer (ray backend by default)
matched = solve(MatchProblem(ffs), GGJModel())
matched.bpen                      # penetrated resonant field, surface × coil

# A rotation scan reuses the one outer solve
nsurf = size(matched.bpen, 1)
bpens = [solve(MatchProblem(ffs; rotation=fill(f, nsurf)), GGJModel()).bpen for f in (1.0, 4.0, 16.0)]

# Tearing growth rates with the SLAYER slab layer
tear = solve(TearingProblem(ffs), SLAYERModel())
tear.gamma_Hz

Runs as written on examples/DIIID-like_ideal_example/ files (~1.5 min).
SLAYER does tearing only: slab, tearing parity.
Riccati also matches: add vac_flag=true; no matched ξ.
TearingProblem with GGJModel() runs; its γ are placeholders.

What changed

MatchProblem + GGJModel(): matching after the solve.
TearingProblem + SLAYERModel()/GGJModel(): growth rates.
Scans reuse one outer solve.
Kinetic profiles live on the equilibrium.
One GGJ-parameter builder, from stored surface geometry.
result.match holds the match, any formalism.
Matched results drop ideal δW; PE skips them.
InnerLayer model types are the solve argument.

Migration

ResistiveMatch(...) → MatchProblem(ffs; ...) + GGJModel().
Runner.run_slayer → TearingProblem + SLAYERModel().
build_ggj_inputs → layer_parameters + ggj_parameters.
Profiles: attach_kinetic_profiles!(eq, file).
result.galerkin.match → result.match.
gpec.h5: GalerkinIntegration/Match/ → SingularSurfaces/Match/.
Decks unchanged; [SLAYER] gains inner_model = "ggj_ray".
Decks with gal_inner_solver = "galerkin": set gal_inner_xfac=10, nx=1280, nq=5 for the old grid.
Matching rejects multi-n and already-matched results.

New defaults

GGJ backend: :ray everywhere, tearing included.
η: Sauter neoclassical.
Galerkin inner grid: backend's 512/4/1.
512/4/1 is ~20× closer to ray than 1280/5/10.

Regression report

7 cases touched by this PR, develop 6fc89d021 vs 289f6ea83.
gal_resistive_diiid: 3 match quantities N/A on develop (path rename).
diiid_slayer_n1: γ 0.02% (known root-finder scatter).
gal_resistive_pe: N/A on both refs (Galerkin PE gap).
Everything else unchanged, incl. diiid_error_field.

Full report

================================================================
Case: gal_resistive_diiid — DIII-D-like, n=1, RDCON outer-region Galerkin Δ′ with rpec coil columns (delta_coil)
================================================================

Regression Report: gal_resistive_diiid
======================================================================================
Ref 1: origin/develop  @ 6fc89d021 (2026-10-09)
       env: julia 1.12.6, arm64-apple-darwin24.0.0, manifest 3ec0d96d (pinned), 6 threads/6 BLAS, jit build
Ref 2: refactor/post-solve-matching  @ 289f6ea83 (2026-10-09)
       env: julia 1.12.6, arm64-apple-darwin24.0.0, manifest 3ec0d96d (pinned), 6 threads/6 BLAS, jit build
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quantity                 origin/develop  refactor/post-solve-matching  Diff     Status
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gal # singular surfaces  4               4                             0.0e+00  OK    
gal singular q values    [4 elem]        [4 elem]                      0.0e+00  OK    
gal PEST3 Δ diagonal     [4 elem]        [4 elem]                      0.0e+00  OK    
||gal Δ′ matrix||        1.244813e+04    1.244813e+04                  0.0e+00  OK    
||gal Δ_coil block||     2.461812e+02    2.461812e+02                  0.0e+00  OK    
gal D_I per surface      [4 elem]        [4 elem]                      0.0e+00  OK    
gal α per surface        [4 elem]        [4 elem]                      0.0e+00  OK    
||gal inner-layer Δ||    N/A             1.474533e+06                  N/A      N/A   
||gal match cout||       N/A             3.061856e-02                  N/A      N/A   
gal match residual       N/A             2.304361e-16                  N/A      N/A   
Runtime (s)              157.0s          128.9s                                 --    
======================================================================================
Summary: 7 unchanged, 3 missing/N/A


================================================================
Case: gal_resistive_pe — DIII-D-like, n=1, DRIVEN/RPEC: gal-matched resistive ξ → PerturbedEquilibrium (coil-driven singular coupling)
================================================================

Regression Report: gal_resistive_pe
==================================================================================
Ref 1: origin/develop  @ 6fc89d021 (2026-10-09)
       env: julia 1.12.6, arm64-apple-darwin24.0.0, manifest 3ec0d96d (pinned), 6 threads/6 BLAS, jit build
Ref 2: refactor/post-solve-matching  @ 289f6ea83 (2026-10-09)
       env: julia 1.12.6, arm64-apple-darwin24.0.0, manifest 3ec0d96d (pinned), 6 threads/6 BLAS, jit build
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quantity                origin/develop  refactor/post-solve-matching  Diff  Status
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rational q values       N/A             N/A                           N/A   N/A   
island half-widths      N/A             N/A                           N/A   N/A   
Chirikov parameter      N/A             N/A                           N/A   N/A   
||resonant b field||    N/A             N/A                           N/A   N/A   
resonant b field (all)  N/A             N/A                           N/A   N/A   
penetrated b field      N/A             N/A                           N/A   N/A   
PE Δ' per surface       N/A             N/A                           N/A   N/A   
||C resonant b field||  N/A             N/A                           N/A   N/A   
Runtime (s)             155.3s          141.6s                              --    
==================================================================================
Summary: 8 missing/N/A


================================================================
Case: ggj_reference — GGJ inner-layer Galerkin solver, Glasser & Wang 2020 Eq. 55, γ = 1+i
================================================================

Regression Report: ggj_reference
==========================================================================
Ref 1: origin/develop  @ 6fc89d021 (2026-10-09)
       env: julia 1.12.6, arm64-apple-darwin24.0.0, manifest 3ec0d96d (pinned), 6 threads/6 BLAS, jit build
Ref 2: refactor/post-solve-matching  @ 289f6ea83 (2026-10-09)
       env: julia 1.12.6, arm64-apple-darwin24.0.0, manifest 3ec0d96d (pinned), 6 threads/6 BLAS, jit build
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quantity     origin/develop  refactor/post-solve-matching  Diff     Status
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re(Δ_odd)    -1.901769e-01   -1.901769e-01                 0.0e+00  OK    
Im(Δ_odd)    -4.159478e-01   -4.159478e-01                 0.0e+00  OK    
Re(Δ_even)   -3.892003e-01   -3.892003e-01                 0.0e+00  OK    
Im(Δ_even)   -3.606845e-01   -3.606845e-01                 0.0e+00  OK    
Runtime (s)  6.2s            7.0s                                   --    
==========================================================================
Summary: 4 unchanged


================================================================
Case: ggj_ray_q500i — GGJ inner-layer :ray backend, q=4 surface, Q = 500i (beyond :galerkin)
================================================================

Regression Report: ggj_ray_q500i
==========================================================================
Ref 1: origin/develop  @ 6fc89d021 (2026-10-09)
       env: julia 1.12.6, arm64-apple-darwin24.0.0, manifest 3ec0d96d (pinned), 6 threads/6 BLAS, jit build
Ref 2: refactor/post-solve-matching  @ 289f6ea83 (2026-10-09)
       env: julia 1.12.6, arm64-apple-darwin24.0.0, manifest 3ec0d96d (pinned), 6 threads/6 BLAS, jit build
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quantity     origin/develop  refactor/post-solve-matching  Diff     Status
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re(Δ_odd)    2.472008e+00    2.472008e+00                  0.0e+00  OK    
Im(Δ_odd)    1.335402e+01    1.335402e+01                  0.0e+00  OK    
Re(Δ_even)   1.374966e-01    1.374966e-01                  0.0e+00  OK    
Im(Δ_even)   7.427542e-01    7.427542e-01                  0.0e+00  OK    
Runtime (s)  14.6s           14.7s                                  --    
==========================================================================
Summary: 4 unchanged


================================================================
Case: diiid_slayer_n1 — DIII-D-like H-mode equilibrium, n=1, SLAYER tearing-mode analysis (uncoupled per-surface, AMR, validity-gated)
================================================================

Regression Report: diiid_slayer_n1
==================================================================================================================
Ref 1: origin/develop  @ 6fc89d021 (2026-10-09)
       env: julia 1.12.6, arm64-apple-darwin24.0.0, manifest 3ec0d96d (pinned), 6 threads/6 BLAS, jit build
Ref 2: refactor/post-solve-matching  @ 289f6ea83 (2026-10-09)
       env: julia 1.12.6, arm64-apple-darwin24.0.0, manifest 3ec0d96d (pinned), 6 threads/6 BLAS, jit build
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quantity                            origin/develop  refactor/post-solve-matching  Diff               Status       
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SLAYER surface indices              [6 elem]        [6 elem]                      0.0e+00            OK           
SLAYER poloidal m                   [6 elem]        [6 elem]                      0.0e+00            OK           
SLAYER toroidal n                   [6 elem]        [6 elem]                      0.0e+00            OK           
SLAYER minor radius rs              [6 elem]        [6 elem]                      0.0e+00            OK           
SLAYER r-based shear                [6 elem]        [6 elem]                      0.0e+00            OK           
SLAYER Lundquist S                  [6 elem]        [6 elem]                      0.0e+00            OK           
SLAYER D_norm                       [6 elem]        [6 elem]                      0.0e+00            OK           
SLAYER P_perp                       [6 elem]        [6 elem]                      0.0e+00            OK           
SLAYER tauk                         [6 elem]        [6 elem]                      0.0e+00            OK           
SLAYER iota_e                       [6 elem]        [6 elem]                      0.0e+00            OK           
SLAYER Q_e                          [6 elem]        [6 elem]                      0.0e+00            OK           
SLAYER Q_i                          [6 elem]        [6 elem]                      0.0e+00            OK           
SLAYER Q_root [2/1,3/1,4/1]         [3 elem]        [3 elem]                      1.4e-05            OK           
SLAYER ω_Hz [2/1,3/1,4/1]           [3 elem]        [3 elem]                      2.2e-06            OK           
SLAYER γ_Hz [2/1,3/1,4/1]           [3 elem]        [3 elem]                      2.132e-01 (0.02%)  ** CHANGED **
SLAYER no_root flags [2/1,3/1,4/1]  [3 elem]        [3 elem]                      0.0e+00            OK           
SLAYER enabled flag                 1               1                             0.0e+00            OK           
Runtime (s)                         193.7s          172.0s                                           --           
==================================================================================================================
Summary: 1 changed, 16 unchanged


================================================================
Case: solovev_kinetic_ntv — Solovev analytical equilibrium, n=1, ideal + PE + NTV torque quadrature
================================================================

Regression Report: solovev_kinetic_ntv
========================================================================================================
Ref 1: origin/develop  @ 6fc89d021 (2026-10-09)
       env: julia 1.12.6, arm64-apple-darwin24.0.0, manifest 3ec0d96d (pinned), 6 threads/6 BLAS, jit build
Ref 2: refactor/post-solve-matching  @ 289f6ea83 (2026-10-09)
       env: julia 1.12.6, arm64-apple-darwin24.0.0, manifest 3ec0d96d (pinned), 6 threads/6 BLAS, jit build
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quantity                                   origin/develop  refactor/post-solve-matching  Diff     Status
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NTV torque fgar [Re, Im]                   [1 elem]        [1 elem]                      0.0e+00  OK    
NTV ψ quadrature evaluations               840             840                           0.0e+00  OK    
root-area-weighted total energy Re(et[1])  4.425941e-01    4.425941e-01                  0.0e+00  OK    
# singular surfaces                        2               2                             0.0e+00  OK    
singular psi locations                     [2 elem]        [2 elem]                      0.0e+00  OK    
q0                                         1.900006e+00    1.900006e+00                  0.0e+00  OK    
Runtime (s)                                202.1s          168.3s                                 --    
========================================================================================================
Summary: 6 unchanged


================================================================
Case: diiid_error_field — DIII-D-like error-field assessment, n=1: ErrorFields stage with the NTV-limited correction couplings
================================================================

Regression Report: diiid_error_field
==============================================================================================================
Ref 1: origin/develop  @ 6fc89d021 (2026-10-09)
       env: julia 1.12.6, arm64-apple-darwin24.0.0, manifest 3ec0d96d (pinned), 6 threads/6 BLAS, jit build
Ref 2: refactor/post-solve-matching  @ 289f6ea83 (2026-10-09)
       env: julia 1.12.6, arm64-apple-darwin24.0.0, manifest 3ec0d96d (pinned), 6 threads/6 BLAS, jit build
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quantity                                         origin/develop  refactor/post-solve-matching  Diff     Status
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EFC overlap per kAt                              [1 elem]        [1 elem]                      0.0e+00  OK    
EFC whole-field NTV torque per kAt² [N·m]        [1 elem]        [1 elem]                      0.0e+00  OK    
EFC residual-field NTV torque per kAt² [N·m]     [1 elem]        [1 elem]                      0.0e+00  OK    
EFC reference rotation ω_ref [rad/s]             [1 elem]        [1 elem]                      0.0e+00  OK    
EFC rotation-scan shifts [rad/s]                 [9 elem]        [9 elem]                      0.0e+00  OK    
EFC residual torque against rotation [N·m/kAt²]  [9 elem]        [9 elem]                      0.0e+00  OK    
dominant-coupling singular values                [3 elem]        [3 elem]                      0.0e+00  OK    
|delta_nominal| of coil set 1                    1.414087e-06    1.414087e-06                  0.0e+00  OK    
|Σ δ_as_designed| of the error-field coils       3.323139e-18    3.323139e-18                  0.0e+00  OK    
Monte Carlo mean |δ| of the error-field coils    4.701976e-05    4.701976e-05                  0.0e+00  OK    
Runtime (s)                                      561.1s          529.0s                                 --    
==============================================================================================================
Summary: 10 unchanged

Reviewing this PR

Review the full diff, not commit by commit.
Turn on "Hide whitespace": _compute_match re-indents a block.
Moved (check only the listed edits):
- gal_match_rpec → _compute_match: ctrl.gal_* → prob.*, the backend if → solve_inner_profile(model, …).
- Its 4·msing system → _match_system, verbatim; a dead duplicate in resonant_match_rpec is deleted.
- GalMatchResult → MatchResult, plus reconnected_flux.
- write_galerkin!'s Match/ block → write_match!, verbatim.
- run_slayer → solve(::TearingProblem) + _tearing_params; only the profile source changed.
- build_ggj_inputs η/ρ → layer_parameters; τ_A/τ_R → ggj_parameters.
- resist_eval deleted: a second port of resist_geometry.
- kinetic_profiles argument → equil.kinetic, in 6 driver functions.
New (where attention belongs):
- MatchProblem, _matched_result/_with, the δW drop.
- TearingProblem, _profiles_from_equilibrium, _tearing_params(::GGJModel).
- GGJModel options and their forwarding (InnerLayer/GGJ/GGJ.jl).
- attach_kinetic_profiles!, equil.kinetic.
- Deck match block in run_force_free_states; new defaults.
- Tests: runtests_matching_models.jl, new runtests_solve_api.jl testsets.

Notes for reviewers

src/ is −185 lines net vs develop.
Deck outputs byte-identical commit to commit, except:
matching moves ≤ 1.2e-10 (geometry ports agree to 2.4e-14).
SLAYER roots scatter run to run (known).
GGJ tearing γ extraction is future work.
Matched PE needs resistive δW: future physics work.
Fortran gpec does the same: drops ideal solutions.
Riccati vs Galerkin bpen differ near the edge.
Galerkin Δ′/Δ_coil edge instability: validate vs Fortran.
|bpen| rising at low rotation is known GGJ behavior.
Develop merged twice; one trivial conflict (CoreTypes.jl).
REFACTOR_PLAN.md leaves the repo (−1117 lines).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01VkufdJ1x3rjhWKMz9FzaMf

…nd read all kinetic stages from it

…red layer-parameter builder

…Problem on the published result

…ped inner-layer model

…st-solve matching

matt-pharr · 2026-10-06T12:43:32Z

CC @jhalpern30 since you were party to the earlier steps of this refactoring

…d model config's way Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…e surface geometry in one place resist_eval re-integrated the same six flux-surface averages that resist_geometry already stores on every surface's restype, and build_ggj_inputs repeated layer_parameters' resistivity and mass-density closure. Both are replaced by one ggj_parameters(sing, equil; eta, rho, gamma) on top of restype, shared by the driven match and the GGJ tearing solve; layer_parameters takes the profile source as a keyword so both callers derive eta/rho through it. The two geometry ports agree to <= 2.4e-14 relative on every surface of the LAR, DIIID Galerkin-resistive and DIIID SLAYER decks (the residue tracks q - q_spline at the rational root). Matched outputs move at round-off only (<= 1.2e-10); ideal, Galerkin-ideal and tearing outputs are unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…er argument of solve ForceFreeStates.GGJ/SLAYER duplicated InnerLayer's GGJModel/SLAYERModel as configuration wrappers, with forwarding methods and a translation step in the tearing solve. The InnerLayer types are now the inner-layer argument of solve(MatchProblem, ·) and solve(TearingProblem, ·) directly: GGJModel carries its backend keywords as options, forwarded to every solve under call-site keywords; SLAYER's chi fallbacks are read from the SLAYERControl that already held them. Removes Matching/Models.jl and the exported GGJ name that collided with the InnerLayer.GGJ submodule. Deck outputs are byte-identical to the previous commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…sistivity the inner-layer defaults everywhere One set of inner-layer defaults, held in one place: - The deck's gal_inner_* keys no longer carry their own grid values (1280/5/10, the Fortran deltac reference); unset keys keep the Galerkin backend's defaults (512/4/1), which agree with the certified ray Δ about 20x more closely on the DIIID matched surfaces at a fraction of the cost. - The ray backend is the default GGJ backend in tearing as well as matching: TearingProblem accepts GGJModel(), and the [SLAYER] deck gains inner_model = "ggj_ray". - layer_parameters and MatchProblem derive the Sauter neoclassical η by default, matching the tearing solve; SpitzerModel() stays selectable. No example deck sets these keys or derives η, so deck outputs are byte-identical to the previous commit; API calls relying on the old defaults move. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…ttach kinetic profiles in one way _matched_result rebuilt ForceFreeStatesResult and GalerkinResult from every field positionally; a field-name copy replaces both and no longer breaks when a field is added. attach_kinetic_profiles! forwards its keywords to load_kinetic_profiles instead of restating them, and becomes the one way to attach profiles: the kinetic_file keyword on PlasmaEquilibrium, which restated the same eight keywords again and had no callers, is removed. Deck outputs are byte-identical to the previous commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VkufdJ1x3rjhWKMz9FzaMf

…seded by MatchProblem scan_resistivity_m2.jl and scan_rotation_m2.jl plotted per-point deck runs that each re-solved the outer region; MatchProblem reuses one outer solve, and the scan is a short loop (docs/api.md). scan_match_m2.jl, added earlier in this branch for that comparison, goes with them. REFACTOR_PLAN.md records the cut-down series. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VkufdJ1x3rjhWKMz9FzaMf

… to what a reader needs User-facing docstrings (MatchProblem, TearingProblem, layer_parameters, MatchResult, attach_kinetic_profiles!) say what is computed, in what units, and how to call it; developer-only file headers, helper docstrings and inline comments shrink to a line or two. Design rationale and history move out of the source. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VkufdJ1x3rjhWKMz9FzaMf

…deal δW from matched results The match product lived inside GalerkinResult, so a Riccati-fed match had nowhere to go and kept only bpen. It now sits on ForceFreeStatesResult beside delta_prime and bpen, for every formalism, and is written under SingularSurfaces/Match/ next to the Δ′ it was solved from. A :matched result drops wp and free_boundary: the ideal δW does not describe the matched plasma, so PerturbedEquilibrium warns and skips instead of mixing ideal and matched physics (as Fortran gpec deallocates its ideal solutions under gal_flag). The ideal reference keeps its δW. Matched-deck datasets are identical apart from the Match/ path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VkufdJ1x3rjhWKMz9FzaMf

…ofile errors, test that solves leave inputs untouched MatchProblem rejects multi-n results, since the forced eigenvalue and field scale use a single n. Missing-profile errors name the deck keys on the deck path and say to attach before solving (or to ffs.equil) on the API path. New tests check that a solve leaves the equilibrium untouched and that repeated MatchProblem solves leave the outer result untouched. api.md notes that Riccati matching needs vac_flag=true and that GGJ tearing γ are placeholders; stale run_slayer references fixed. REFACTOR_PLAN.md leaves the repository; §7D is to be re-planned. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VkufdJ1x3rjhWKMz9FzaMf

matt-pharr · 2026-10-08T13:07:19Z

Also CC @StuartBenjamin for the new syntax which will be particularly useful for tearing suite

…netic and deck matching rules, fix stale docs

matt-pharr added 5 commits October 6, 2026 10:20

Equilibrium - FEATURE! - Attach kinetic profiles to the equilibrium a…

bde0f4c

…nd read all kinetic stages from it

ForceFreeStates - FEATURE - Add inner-layer model configs and the sha…

56dff18

…red layer-parameter builder

ForceFreeStates - API! - Make inner-layer matching a post-solve Match…

721e391

…Problem on the published result

Tearing - API! - Pose the tearing solve as a TearingProblem with a ty…

0b5e2fc

…ped inner-layer model

Repo - FEATURE - Add the one-solve inner-layer scan benchmark over po…

a3a8a3f

…st-solve matching

matt-pharr self-assigned this Oct 6, 2026

matt-pharr requested a review from d-burg October 6, 2026 12:41

github-actions Bot added api Config key, output dataset or exported name changed changed-results Results move or an interface breaks - read before upgrading labels Oct 6, 2026

matt-pharr changed the title ~~ForceFreeStates/Tearing - API! - Pose inner-layer matching and tearing as problems solved on the published result~~ ForceFreeStates/Tearing - API - Pose inner-layer matching and tearing as problems solved on the published result Oct 6, 2026

github-actions Bot removed the changed-results Results move or an interface breaks - read before upgrading label Oct 6, 2026

matt-pharr added this to the GPEC v2.0.0 milestone Oct 6, 2026

matt-pharr and others added 3 commits October 6, 2026 16:29

Test - TEST - Rename the InnerLayer GGJ test alias out of the exporte…

6763ade

…d model config's way Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

matt-pharr changed the title ~~ForceFreeStates/Tearing - API - Pose inner-layer matching and tearing as problems solved on the published result~~ ForceFreeStates/Tearing - API! - Pose inner-layer matching and tearing as problems solved on the published result Oct 7, 2026

github-actions Bot added the changed-results Results move or an interface breaks - read before upgrading label Oct 7, 2026

matt-pharr and others added 7 commits October 7, 2026 12:50

Merge develop into refactor/post-solve-matching

172574a

matt-pharr marked this pull request as draft October 8, 2026 21:00

matt-pharr added 2 commits October 9, 2026 15:57

ForceFreeStates - MINOR - Guard matching inputs, restore develop's ki…

1887373

…netic and deck matching rules, fix stale docs

Merge develop into refactor/post-solve-matching

289f6ea

matt-pharr marked this pull request as ready for review October 9, 2026 15:16

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

ForceFreeStates/Tearing - API! - Pose inner-layer matching and tearing as problems solved on the published result - #507

ForceFreeStates/Tearing - API! - Pose inner-layer matching and tearing as problems solved on the published result#507
matt-pharr wants to merge 17 commits into
developfrom
refactor/post-solve-matching

matt-pharr commented Oct 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

matt-pharr commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

matt-pharr commented Oct 8, 2026

Uh oh!

This branch has not been deployed

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

matt-pharr commented Oct 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Release note

What changed

Migration

New defaults

Regression report

Reviewing this PR

Notes for reviewers

Uh oh!

matt-pharr commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

matt-pharr commented Oct 8, 2026

Uh oh!

This branch has not been deployed

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

matt-pharr commented Oct 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading