Skip to content

⚙️ [Maintenance]: Adopt Process-PSModule v6.1.4 and require Pester 6.x in tests#121

Open
Marius Storhaug (MariusStorhaug) wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
maintenance/lock-pester-major-6
Open

⚙️ [Maintenance]: Adopt Process-PSModule v6.1.4 and require Pester 6.x in tests#121
Marius Storhaug (MariusStorhaug) wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
maintenance/lock-pester-major-6

Conversation

@MariusStorhaug

@MariusStorhaug Marius Storhaug (MariusStorhaug) commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This module now runs on the latest Process-PSModule automation (v6.1.4) and pins its test suite to Pester 6, so continuous integration uses the current build, test, and publish pipeline and the tests fail fast if Pester 6 is ever missing.

Changed: CI runs on Process-PSModule v6.1.4

The reusable workflow pin moves to v6.1.4 from the module's previously pinned v5 release, adopting the current pipeline, including the Pester 6 test runner and the consolidated TestData secret model. No caller changes are required — the existing secrets wiring keeps passing everything the pipeline needs.

Changed: Tests require Pester 6.x

Every test file now declares the Pester 6 requirement, so the suite always resolves Pester 6 and fails with a clear message if only an older Pester is available, instead of silently running on it.

Technical Details

  • .github/workflows/Process-PSModule.yml: pin bumped to workflow.yml@da180bac16b13bfbcdf08b2e4e221b5b49e5ff28 # v6.1.4.
  • tests/*.Tests.ps1: added #Requires -Modules @{ ModuleName = 'Pester'; ModuleVersion = '6.0.0'; MaximumVersion = '6.*' }.
  • Classic Should assertions are left unchanged. Pester 6 is backward-compatible, so converting to the new Should-* syntax is intentionally out of scope for this maintenance change.
  • Supersedes any stale Dependabot bump of the Process-PSModule pin.

Loading
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants