Admit identity-seeded reduction controls with total publication - #17
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
later field-derived control
Uniquelaws and rejectexisting-value-seeded reductions
mask, and subset controls that still initialize every destination
publication, prefix/mask/subset selection, and relaxed atomic reduction
fixture through the ordinary inventories
Why this is required
CorePotts' bounded maintained-minimum reconstruction computes whether the
completed structural transaction changed any ownership or source value, then
uses that reduced Boolean field to gate the sole full-lattice rebuild. A
reduction with an
IdentitySeedinitializes every destination even when nocontribution is routed, but LocalMath's dependency planner previously assumed
that every total publication law owned a
coveragefield.Reducedeliberately does not. This change gives the existing planner one semantic
totality predicate; it adds no executor, registry, or alternate scheduling
path.
Validation
inventory cohort: 122/122
disabled: 62/62
previously failing reduction-gate planning boundary; subsequent execution
exposed a separate Sequential transaction-alias defect in the Core
candidate
CPU and Metal are the qualified execution paths. This does not claim total
publication for a stage controlled by a gate, for an
ExistingSeedreduction, or for untested CUDA, ROCm, custom backends, or provider array
wrappers.