Skip to content

fix(collaboration): routine system prompt, SaveDraft in routines, rea… - #3212

Closed
kunal0137 wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
fix-collaboration-routine-drafts
Closed

kunal0137 wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
fix-collaboration-routine-drafts

Conversation

@kunal0137

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

…d-only memory

  • Routine runs get their own baseline (CollaborationPrompts.routinePrompt) instead of the chat prompt, with where the answer goes per delivery; the run message now carries only name, time, documents, skills and task.
  • Routines can save email drafts with SaveDraft (never sent, Settings draft folder); chats are refused it.
  • Memory is read only in routines: Remember and Forget are left out and refused.
  • Delivery reaches the room as the server-owned collaboration_routine_delivery option.
  • Routine guide and CreateRoutine allow naming who a draft is for.

Description

Changes Made

How to Test

  1. Steps to reproduce/test the behavior
  2. Expected outcomes

Notes

…d-only memory

- Routine runs get their own baseline (CollaborationPrompts.routinePrompt) instead of the chat prompt, with where the answer goes per delivery; the run message now carries only name, time, documents, skills and task.
- Routines can save email drafts with SaveDraft (never sent, Settings draft folder); chats are refused it.
- Memory is read only in routines: Remember and Forget are left out and refused.
- Delivery reaches the room as the server-owned collaboration_routine_delivery option.
- Routine guide and CreateRoutine allow naming who a draft is for.
@snyk-io

snyk-io Bot commented Oct 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
✅ Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants