Qualify retained static iSCSI recovery on TrueNAS 25.10.7 - #1232
Draft
MrStarktastic wants to merge 10 commits into
Draft
MrStarktastic wants to merge 10 commits into
MrStarktastic wants to merge 10 commits into
Conversation
3 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SQLite application data on NFS needs a storage path that survives complete cluster replacement without accidentally creating empty databases. This PR records the isolated TrueNAS 25.10.7 qualification of retained static iSCSI, using the stock democratic-csi node-manual plugin and an external NAS lifecycle. It changes test fixtures and documentation; it deploys no production storage or application migration.
The latest report is
docs/superpowers/reports/2026-09-21-static-iscsi-recovery.md. Earlier REST-controller results and driver evaluations remain historical evidence; the selected candidate has no NAS API credential, dynamic provisioner, CSI snapshot controller or CSI expansion controller in Kubernetes.Verified in the isolated lab:
All four lab VMs and disks, private networks, staged media, transient services, tunnel and private runtime were removed. Runner 300 was restored. Production remained 125/125 ready pods, 77/77 Synced/Healthy applications and 68/68 unchanged PV bindings.
Validation: static identity/capacity/disk tests, existing guard/lifecycle tests, repository pre-commit checks, and actual Kubernetes admission/reconciliation. See the report for exact counts and independent review findings. This is a run-specific correctness rehearsal, not a workload benchmark or production-ready recovery operator. Production-scoped fencing permissions, placement-specific writer authorization, onboarding interruption handling and a Jellyfin cold restore still need qualification before a pilot.
Production preparation now includes
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-09-21-jellyfin-iscsi-pilot-design.mdand sanitized read-only preflight evidence. The proposal covers a 64 GiB retained target, scoped Proxmox fencing, movable disposable cache, cold backup/restore, controlled cutover and rollback after new writes. The audit foundsync=disabledon existingapps/pv; correcting it is a separate reviewed production change. No NAS property, ACL or storage binding was changed. Terraform #223 has been merged and both workers are verified at 28 GiB. The user approved the pilot design and confirmed the encrypted laptop backup destination. The implementation plan atdocs/superpowers/plans/2026-09-21-jellyfin-iscsi-pilot.mdseparates four PR groups, shared maintenance coordination, failure-path tests and live qualification gates; it is ready for execution review. No production implementation or migration has run.