Skip to content

Raise an error when simplex reaches max iterations - #15268

Closed
Rokesh2008 wants to merge 2 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Rokesh2008:fix/simplex-maxiter-error
Closed

Raise an error when simplex reaches max iterations#15268
Rokesh2008 wants to merge 2 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Rokesh2008:fix/simplex-maxiter-error

Conversation

@Rokesh2008

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes #14584\n\nReopens this contribution with the Ruff EM102 fix applied: the exception message is assigned before raising ValueError.\n\nThe prior PR #15243 was closed before the workflow fix could be applied.

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper Bot added awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed merge conflicts Open a new PR or rebase on the latest commit labels Sep 10, 2026
@algorithms-keeper

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closing this pull request as invalid

@Rokesh2008, this pull request is being closed as none of the checkboxes have been marked. It is important that you go through the checklist and mark the ones relevant to this pull request. Please read the Contributing guidelines.

If you're facing any problem on how to mark a checkbox, please read the following instructions:

  • Read a point one at a time and think if it is relevant to the pull request or not.
  • If it is, then mark it by putting a x between the square bracket like so: [x]

NOTE: Only [x] is supported so if you have put any other letter or symbol between the brackets, that will be marked as invalid. If that is the case then please open a new pull request with the appropriate changes.

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper Bot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Sep 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

invalid merge conflicts Open a new PR or rebase on the latest commit

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: run_simplex() returns empty dict {} on max iteration instead of raising an informative error

1 participant