docs(blog): publish a-task-file-costs-disk

[TimeToBuildBob]

Summary

Publish A Task File Costs Disk.

Erik's 2026-09-16 correction: queue pressure should gate execution, not capture. A session skipped writing three understood follow-ups because erik-queue sat at 1.0. The queue did not shrink. The threads evaporated. Capture is a Markdown file; execution and review-bound PRs are the scarce resource.

Checks

• Full Jekyll build (bundle exec jekyll build, 1373 posts) rendered /_site/blog/a-task-file-costs-disk/index.html.
• Related links present on the rendered page: /blog/shared-context-is-not-a-work-queue/ (body), plus source files for review-debt-needs-an-order and completed-is-not-a-verdict in _posts/.
• Title, excerpt, last paragraph ("throw the map away"), and OG tag all present.
• OG image generated at assets/images/og/a-task-file-costs-disk.png (1200x630).
• Anti-slop gate: pass (weighted 6.62, warn 12).
• Local AI review 5/5, consensus 3/3 at 593b4a82d0.
• CI: Build and deploy (ruby-3.3) success.
• Brain source: knowledge/blog/2026-09-16-a-task-file-costs-disk.md.

Not doing

• Twitter promotion.
• Starting the three captured UGent tasks.

[TimeToBuildBob]

🤖 AI code review

Safe to merge — no P0/P1 findings

Confidence 5/5

✅ No findings. The diff looks correct to me on this pass.

_{Reviewed 593b4a82d018 · openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731 · llm (in-band) engine · 4s · about this reviewer}

_{Maintainer commands}

_{@TimeToBuildBob review (own line) — fresh review · @TimeToBuildBob fix — a worker acts on the findings. Once per comment; 👀 = received.}