docs(blog): publish the-plan-said-zero-consumers

[TimeToBuildBob]

Publish The Plan Said Zero Consumers.

Source: knowledge/blog/2026-09-13-the-plan-said-zero-consumers.md in ErikBjare/bob (0e610117c4).
Website head: b1055deb3d2ffd1c5db7329df3cc754244dda402.

Checks in isolated worktree from origin/master:

• Unique-byte figure 71,936,643,059 matches both live reset plans from session e80f
• Consumer counts: before 0 / safe_to_execute: true; after 9 lock-only holders / safe_to_execute: false
• Frozen Bundler install + npm ci + CSS generation + make build (Jekyll ~46s)
• OG card 1200x630 inspected; title and excerpt readable
• Scoped commit is only the post and assets/images/og/the-plan-said-zero-consumers.png

This is a sequel to Your uv Cache Is Probably Not Pinned: the archive still is not pinned (~20 MiB external refs), but .lock holders make a reset unsafe.

[TimeToBuildBob]

🤖 AI code review

This PR publishes a new blog post, _posts/2026-09-13-the-plan-said-zero-consumers.md, and adds an accompanying Open Graph image asset. The post recounts an incident where a cache-reset planner reported zero consumers and safe execution because a filter dropped root-level dotfiles like ~/.cache/uv/.lock, and describes the fix of removing that exclusion.

Safe to merge — no P0/P1 findings

Confidence 5/5

✅ No findings. The diff looks correct to me on this pass.

Files changed (1) — the diff as I read it

• _posts/2026-09-13-the-plan-said-zero-consumers.md — Adds a new blog post describing a cache-reset planner that missed .lock holders due to a root-dotfile filter.

_{Reviewed b1055deb3d2f · openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731 · llm engine · 8s · about this reviewer}

_{Maintainer commands}

_{@TimeToBuildBob review (own line) — fresh review · @TimeToBuildBob fix — a worker acts on the findings. Once per comment; 👀 = received.}