Skip to content

Revise overview of NLAP protocol in README - #218

Merged
clauspruefer merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
clauspruefer-patch-2
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

Revise overview of NLAP protocol in README#218
clauspruefer merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
clauspruefer-patch-2

Conversation

@clauspruefer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Pull Request

Description

Updated the overview section to clarify the purpose and capabilities of NLAP.

Updated the overview section to clarify the purpose and capabilities of NLAP.
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 19, 2026 07:36
@clauspruefer
clauspruefer merged commit f82dc3a into main Aug 19, 2026
4 checks passed

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the README’s “Overview” section to better describe NLAP’s purpose as an ultra-low-latency TCP transport/middleware stack, clarifying its current focus outside the browser while noting potential future browser integration.

Changes:

  • Rewrites the overview paragraph to emphasize TCP, XML message framing, and standalone infrastructure focus.
  • Adds clarification about long-term potential for browser integration to reduce web-app latency.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread README.md

An advanced architectural paradigm for **low-latency** **TCP**/IP transport tailored for
modern browser web-applications and **high-throughput** data aggregation middleware.
A low-latency, TCP XML-message-framed Next-Level Application Protocol Suite and server
@clauspruefer
clauspruefer deleted the clauspruefer-patch-2 branch August 20, 2026 09:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants