Fix backup dates - #6473
Fix backup dates#6473
Conversation
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@GutoVeronezi a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
@GutoVeronezi a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with |
|
Found UI changes, kicking a new UI QA build |
|
@acs-robot a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
1 similar comment
|
@acs-robot a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
UI build: ✖️ |
|
UI build: ✖️ |
|
Packaging result: ✖️ el7 ✖️ el8 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 1 |
|
Packaging result: ✖️ el7 ✖️ el8 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 3617 |
|
Found UI changes, kicking a new UI QA build |
|
@acs-robot a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
1 similar comment
|
@acs-robot a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
UI build: ✖️ |
Co-authored-by: dahn <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
|
Found UI changes, kicking a new UI QA build |
|
@acs-robot a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
UI build: ✖️ |
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
|
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch. |
|
[LL]Trillian test result (tid-6537)
|
|
@DaanHoogland could we run the CI again for this PR as well? |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SF] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 6475 |
|
@blueorangutan test rocky8 vmware-67u3 |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SF] Trillian-Jenkins test job (rocky8 mgmt + vmware-67u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
changed the label to 4.19 as the upgrade file changes are related to 4.19 version |
|
@DaanHoogland I think BO ended up not running the tests on this one, can we retry? |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@JoaoJandre a [SF] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 6723 |
|
@blueorangutan test rocky8 vmware-67u3 |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SF] Trillian-Jenkins test job (rocky8 mgmt + vmware-67u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-7358)
|
|
I looked at some of these errors and none of them seemed related to this PR, could we rerun the tests? |
|
@blueorangutan test rocky8 vmware-67u3 |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SF] Trillian-Jenkins test job (rocky8 mgmt + vmware-67u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-7378)
|
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-7386)
|
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@JoaoJandre a [SF] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
@blueorangutan test rocky8 vmware-67u3 |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SF] Trillian-Jenkins test job (rocky8 mgmt + vmware-67u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-7456)
|








Description
Currently, the backup date in Veeam is collected as a
Stringand saved asVARCHAR(255)in the database, which can lead to errors and inconsistencies.We are proposing with this PR to persist the backup dates as a
DATETIMEobject, which will enable us to properly manipulate it, regardless of the date format used in the environment. The UI was also changed to display the complete data format.When upgrading the DB schema, we delete all backup entries in the DB; these backups are synchronized with Veeam backups by ACS afterwards. In the end, no Veeam backups should be lost. Only dummy backups will be permanently deleted, and since they are not relevant in production, no harm will be caused.
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Storage->Backups

Instances->VM->Backups

How Has This Been Tested?
This was tested in a local lab, by upgrading the DB schema and then checking if ACS would correctly synchronize with Veeam. After that, the UI was checked to see if everything was as expected.
New backups were created and checked. The same tests were made using the dummy provider.