agent: remove powermock from tests

[vishesh92]

Description

This PR removes usage of powermock from agent's tests.

After this change, this is the remaining usage of powermock left.

$ git grep "PowerMockito" | tr "/" " "| awk '{print $1, $2, $3, $4}' | sort | uniq -c 
     76 api src test java
     51 core src test java
     37 engine schema src test
     68 engine storage configdrive src
      9 engine storage snapshot src
     11 plugins acl project-role-based src
      3 plugins database quota src
    150 plugins hypervisors kvm src
      3 plugins hypervisors vmware src
     40 plugins hypervisors xenserver src
      5 plugins integrations kubernetes-service src
      2 plugins network-elements nicira-nvp src
     96 plugins network-elements tungsten src
      1 plugins storage volume storpool
     17 plugins user-authenticators ldap src
    196 server src test java
      4 services console-proxy server src
      2 services secondary-storage server src
      2 vmware-base src test java

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #7637 (c59208f) into main (27b0a64) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #7637   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     13.12%   13.13%           
- Complexity     9143     9147    +4     
=========================================
  Files          2728     2728           
  Lines        256997   256997           
  Branches      40067    40067           
=========================================
+ Hits          33729    33748   +19     
+ Misses       219021   218997   -24     
- Partials       4247     4252    +5     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[vishesh92]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@vishesh92 a [SF] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el7 ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 6242

[vishesh92]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@vishesh92 a [SF] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el7 ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 6245

[vishesh92]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@vishesh92 a [SF] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 6257

[yadvr]

@blueorangutan test

[blueorangutan]

@rohityadavcloud a [SF] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-6757)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 39217 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr7637-t6757-kvm-centos7.zip
Smoke tests completed. 111 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File

[DaanHoogland]

tlgtm

[weizhouapache]

code lgtm

@vishesh92
are you still working on other tests ? will you update this PR or create new PR ?

[vishesh92]

@weizhouapache I was planning to create separate PRs. Not sure how much time it will take to replace all the tests. And I don't want to have one huge PR with a lot of changes.

[weizhouapache]

@weizhouapache I was planning to create separate PRs. Not sure how much time it will take to replace all the tests. And I don't want to have one huge PR with a lot of changes.

@vishesh92
fine, I will merge this