Honor Codex proxy-owned model selection - #1076
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Devin Review found 1 potential issue.
1 flag not posted on this PR by your GitHub settings — view it in Devin Review. (Configure)
|
Addressed the proxy-owned Codex effort finding. Requested |
|
Thermo-nuclear review at exact head I ran a real Docker BenchFlow trial through the live Azure route with The remaining concern is ownership. This PR adds a second I think the code-judo move is to extend the canonical Codex configuration helper so it applies provider selection and requested reasoning effort atomically, then have runtime make one direct helper call. That should delete the local This is not cosmetic: merging the current #1076 and #1080 heads takes |
|
@bingran-you Addressed requested ownership change in Codex launch configuration now has one canonical owner in Tests now cover malformed config at canonical boundary, with thin runtime ownership/fallback checks. Validation: affected tests |
|
Thermo-nuclear exact-head follow-up at The ownership restructuring is correct: The exact-head Docker run through the real Azure route completed end to end with reward 1 and one tool call. Both provider responses used For completeness, forcing I authored the final alias-binding repair during this review, so an independent maintainer must review this exact SHA before squash merge under the repository policy. |
Summary
Validation
Review
Maintainer or other-person review required. Author will not self-merge.