Skip to content

Improve connection review and file workspace usability - #242

Merged
bifrost0x merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
dev/usability-five-fixes
Sep 26, 2026
Merged

bifrost0x merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
dev/usability-five-fixes

Conversation

@bifrost0x

@bifrost0x bifrost0x commented Sep 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Explain unavailable SSH keys when reviewing saved connections and clear stale key selections in legacy profiles.
  • Give file actions and saved-item menus clear accessible names, and keep split file toolbars usable with mouse and touch input.
  • Hide the empty recent-connections card while preserving the populated history flow.

Verification

  • npm run vendor:check — 10 assets verified
  • npm run lint:js — passed
  • npm run test:js — 671 passed
  • Relevant Python UI tests on 3.11 and 3.14 — 117 passed on each
  • Browser tests — 180 passed with one existing baseline test excluded

The full local runs expose two failures reproduced on unchanged e1b3e225: the legacy command-store quota assertion, and the settings theme capture height assertion (1141px versus a 1080px viewport). The quota implementation is untouched; the theme geometry failure occurs identically on the base commit.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-26T13:24:00.280457Z f20e374 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f20e374aca

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread static/js/app.js Outdated
@bifrost0x bifrost0x self-assigned this Sep 26, 2026
@bifrost0x bifrost0x added enhancement New feature or request documentation Improvements or additions to documentation gui labels Sep 26, 2026
@bifrost0x
bifrost0x merged commit 7c79902 into main Sep 26, 2026
25 of 26 checks passed
@bifrost0x
bifrost0x deleted the dev/usability-five-fixes branch September 26, 2026 19:22
@bifrost0x bifrost0x mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2026
7 tasks done
@bifrost0x bifrost0x added this to the v2.5.0 milestone Oct 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request gui

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant