Repository navigation
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Eval results
Full reportQuality
Noise
Calibration
Latency
Cost
Cases
run file: tmp/bench/run.json Run
|
|
Five
Missed in all five runs, caught by Copilot: Retry after task creation makes a second task (draft-tasks-api), Sync advances last_synced_at even when the page cap cut the walk short (paged-connectors), and both route-discovery reals. Opus catches Update can overwrite a draft that was sent in the meantime every run, which Copilot misses. No labelled real was held back by post-process. Screened out on recall: below main and Copilot, though about 6x faster and cheaper than main. 🤖 Generated with Claude Code |
…odex run Add an opus-cli variant that reviews through the Claude Code CLI. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
✅ No new changes recommended Files reviewed (3)
Change risk: routine (review need 0.32)
Escalations: none Thingie details
1 finding not posted as review commentsMedium · CLI sees future changes during first-push runs ·
|
|
One local run through the Claude Code CLI (
It is the first Opus run to catch Sync advances last_synced_at even when the page cap cut the walk short, but it missed Note comment failure is swallowed, which every OpenRouter run caught. The Opus critic cut hard (28 first-pass findings to 3 posted on attach-drafts-to-lists final push). The matcher also ran on Opus here rather than glm-5.3, so the judge differs from the other columns. 🤖 Generated with Claude Code |
Hypothesis: Opus 5.5 reviewing (critic stays glm-5.3-flash) closes the recall gap to Copilot (9/13 final-push reals, 5% nits) without adding wrong findings.
Read against
main's baseline in the Eval results comment and against Copilot inevals/bench/copilot/report.md(#187). Fiveeval-fullruns planned; roughly $30 per run at Opus pricing.🤖 Generated with Claude Code