Skip to content

fix(generator): align preserved boundary overrides and shape checks - #242

Open
leoafarias wants to merge 5 commits into
refactor/2.0-dart-ownershipfrom
fix/2.0-generator-boundary-integration
Open

leoafarias wants to merge 5 commits into
refactor/2.0-dart-ownershipfrom
fix/2.0-generator-boundary-integration

Conversation

@leoafarias

@leoafarias leoafarias commented Oct 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Complete the integration of merged #240 with the release cleanup in #241.

  • Honor effective nullable overrides through preserved boundaries and aliases, without changing nested value nullability.
  • Reuse reference resolution and reject hidden object-shape changes, including through aliases, parentheses, and fluent codecs.
  • Keep both regression fixture sets and consolidate alpha.2 notes without changing published history.

Contextual member names, deep JSON snapshots, and native boundary types are inherited from #240, not new changes in this PR.

Validation

  • 3,228 workspace tests passed, including 736 generator tests and real build/analyze/runtime/rebuild fixtures.

  • Analysis, formatting, 50 Chrome cases, alpha.1 API compatibility, and five zero-warning publish dry runs passed.

  • Boundary regressions failed before their fixes. The ancestry-only stack update preserves the exact tested tree.

  • CI and release preflight passed on e5c8400, including both minimum SDKs and clean regeneration.

Four live Firebase tests remain skipped.

@leoafarias
leoafarias added this pull request to stack #238 October 26, 2026 23:45
@leoafarias leoafarias changed the title fix(generator): reconcile JSON boundary and member contracts fix(generator): align preserved boundary overrides and shape checks Oct 27, 2026
@leoafarias
leoafarias marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2026 00:17
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T00:18:23.353773Z e5c8400 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant