Skip to content

Update dependency vitest to v4.1.11 [SECURITY] - #90

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability
Open

renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
vitest (source) 4.1.7 → 4.1.11 age confidence

Vitest: Path Traversal / Arbitrary File Read via @​vitest/mocker Redirect Mock

CVE-2026-84373 / GHSA-82fw-gwwq-j7x9

More information

Details

Summary

@vitest/mocker registers a redirect mock's target path without validating it
against the dev server's file-serving allowlist. An attacker who can reach the
dev server's WebSocket can register a redirect mock pointing outside the project
root; when the mocked module is requested, the plugin's load hook returns
readFile(<attacker path>) as the module source, disclosing local files.

This is exploitable without authentication only through the public
mockerPlugin / standalone interceptorPlugin exports (used by third-party dev
servers), which register the handler on Vite's unauthenticated HMR socket.
Vitest's own browser mode registers mocks over a token-authenticated RPC and
is not remotely reachable by default (see Scope).

Affected code

packages/mocker/src/node/interceptorPlugin.ts.

The load hook is the file-read sink:

if (mock.type === 'redirect') {
  return readFile(mock.redirect, 'utf-8')
}

mock.redirect is derived from client input at registration time with no
boundary check:

if (event.type === 'redirect') {
  const redirectUrl = new URL(event.redirect)
  event.redirect = join(server.config.root, redirectUrl.pathname)
}
registry.register(event)

There is no server.fs.allow / server.fs.deny check and no assertion that the
resolved path stays within the project root.

Registration paths and trust boundaries
  • Public mockerPlugin / interceptorPlugin (unauthenticated). In
    configureServer, the plugin registers server.ws.on('vitest:interceptor:register', …)
    on Vite's HMR WebSocket. That socket performs no token, Origin, or same-origin
    check, so any client that can reach it can register a redirect mock. This is
    the path the "unauthenticated" impact applies to.
  • Vitest browser mode (authenticated). Mocks register over the browser RPC
    (registerMock), which sits behind a per-run token (isValidApiRequest, a
    random api.token). The interceptor's configureServer socket is not used for
    registration here (in v5 it does not run at all, as the plugin is injected per
    environment). The same missing boundary check exists on the authenticated RPC
    path, but reaching it requires the token, so it is not a remote-unauthenticated
    read.
Path handling

new URL(redirect).pathname combined with join(root, pathname) does not
confine reads to the root:

  • Special/hierarchical schemes (file:, http:) are normalized by WHATWG URL,
    so .. segments are collapsed and the result stays under the root. Payloads of
    the form file:///../../etc/passwd do not escape.
  • A non-special (opaque) scheme preserves .. in pathname, so
    join(root, "../../…/etc/passwd") resolves outside the root and reads an
    arbitrary file.

Even without escaping the root, the missing server.fs check allows reading any
in-root file the dev server would otherwise refuse to serve (for example an
in-root .env or source that is denied by server.fs.deny).

Scope / preconditions
  • This is a development-server issue. The dev server binds to localhost by
    default and is not reachable from the network unless the developer exposes it
    (server.host / 0.0.0.0, a LAN bind, or a proxy).
  • A raw (non-browser) client against a reachable server bypasses browser origin
    and CORS protections entirely and can both register the mock and read the
    response.
  • A browser-based drive-by against a localhost server is substantially mitigated
    by Vite defaults: the default CORS origin allowlist is limited to localhost
    origins, and server.allowedHosts blocks DNS-rebinding, so a cross-origin page
    cannot read the file contents back.
Impact

Disclosure of local files readable by the dev-server process (source, in-root
.env/secrets, and, via the opaque-scheme payload, files outside the project
root). No integrity or availability impact.

Affected versions

Present since @vitest/mocker was introduced.

  • Affected: @vitest/mocker >= 2.1.0 (shipped in vitest and
    @vitest/browser >= 2.1.0), through 4.1.x and the 5.0.0 pre-releases.
  • Fixed: Vitest 4.1.11 and 5.0.0. Older majors (2.1.x, 3.x) are not
    maintained and are not planned to receive the fix.
Fix

Validate the resolved redirect target against Vite's file-serving allowlist
(isFileLoadingAllowed) before registering it, at every registration site, and
stop registering the interceptor WebSocket events in Vitest's browser mode
(mocks there flow through the authenticated RPC).

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 5.9 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (vitest)

v4.1.11

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.10

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.9

Compare Source

🐞 Bug Fixes
  • Fix importOriginal with optimizer and query import [backport to v4] - by Hiroshi Ogawa, David Harris, Codexand Vladimir in #​10546 (a5180)
  • browser:
    • Wait for orchestrator readiness before resolving browser sessions [backport to v4] - by Vladimir and Séamus O'Connor in #​10555 (7fb29)
    • Wait for iframe tester readiness before preparing [backport to v4] - by Vladimir and Séamus O'Connor in #​10497 and #​10556 (fbc62)
  • mocker:
    • Hoist vi.mock() for vite-plus/test imports [backport to v4] - by Hiroshi Ogawa, LongYinan, Claude Opus 4.8 and Vladimir in #​10548 (2c955)
  • pool:
    • Prevent test run hang on worker crash [backport to v4] - by Ari Perkkiö and Jattioui Ismail in #​10543 and #​10564 (934b0)
View changes on GitHub

v4.1.8

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone America/Los_Angeles)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate

renovate Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: package-lock.json
npm error Cannot read properties of null (reading 'edgesOut')
npm error A complete log of this run can be found in: /runner/cache/others/npm/_logs/2026-10-15T06_00_39_615Z-debug-0.log

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-new Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@convex-dev/action-cache@90

commit: 6d87ee0

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from d48afdd to 1e3ec19 Compare October 9, 2026 11:21
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from d9c1aec to d5c3ecb Compare October 14, 2026 23:13
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from d5c3ecb to 6d87ee0 Compare October 15, 2026 06:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants