Update README

[hernanponcedeleon]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Performance comparison

Linux x64

Benchmark details

Memory model: vmm

Benchmark	Base branch	PR branch	Improvement (99% CI)	Result
benchmarks/locks/cna.c	10.127 ± 0.090 s	10.137 ± 0.154 s	➖ -0.1% [-11.8%, +11.6%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/locks/mutex_musl.c	22.603 ± 2.714 s	22.495 ± 1.722 s	➖ -0.4% [-73.9%, +73.2%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/lfds/dglm.c	18.547 ± 1.422 s	19.095 ± 1.709 s	➖ -3.3% [-72.0%, +65.3%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/lfds/ms.c	33.048 ± 5.175 s	33.686 ± 6.487 s	➖ -3.6% [-144.5%, +137.3%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/lfds/treiber.c	8.314 ± 0.651 s	8.915 ± 0.074 s	➖ -7.7% [-63.7%, +48.3%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/lfds/safe_stack.c	5.873 ± 0.929 s	6.672 ± 0.166 s	➖ -15.1% [-99.4%, +69.1%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/challenging/cna.c	34.789 ± 0.670 s	32.667 ± 4.857 s	➖ +6.2% [-69.3%, +81.7%]	UNKNOWN

Memory model: aarch64

Benchmark	Base branch	PR branch	Improvement (99% CI)	Result
benchmarks/locks/linuxrwlock.c	7.361 ± 0.083 s	7.538 ± 0.066 s	➖ -2.4% [-9.2%, +4.4%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/locks/mutex_musl.c	4.580 ± 0.686 s	5.325 ± 0.046 s	➖ -17.9% [-113.9%, +78.1%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/challenging/cna.c	9.321 ± 1.229 s	10.395 ± 0.636 s	➖ -12.3% [-59.7%, +35.2%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/challenging/wsq.c	6.042 ± 0.089 s	6.020 ± 0.035 s	➖ +0.4% [-4.8%, +5.5%]	UNKNOWN

Memory model: power

Benchmark	Base branch	PR branch	Improvement (99% CI)	Result
benchmarks/locks/linuxrwlock.c	14.315 ± 0.340 s	14.202 ± 0.664 s	➖ +0.8% [-16.1%, +17.7%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/locks/mutex_musl.c	15.501 ± 1.658 s	17.596 ± 0.239 s	➖ -14.5% [-96.3%, +67.2%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/lfds/ms.c	27.341 ± 5.834 s	22.601 ± 1.600 s	➖ +15.3% [-75.8%, +106.3%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/lfds/treiber.c	15.867 ± 1.991 s	17.053 ± 1.483 s	➖ -8.2% [-78.9%, +62.5%]	UNKNOWN

Total

Benchmarks	Base branch	PR branch	Improvement (99% CI)
All reported benchmarks	233.629 ± 6.530 s	234.399 ± 12.215 s	➖ -0.3% [-18.0%, +17.4%]

3 benchmark(s) omitted because both averages were below 5 seconds.

macOS ARM64

Benchmark details

Memory model: vmm

Benchmark	Base branch	PR branch	Improvement (99% CI)	Result
benchmarks/locks/cna.c	21.853 ± 0.407 s	22.432 ± 1.109 s	➖ -2.7% [-34.3%, +29.0%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/locks/mutex_musl.c	40.194 ± 2.315 s	45.290 ± 1.281 s	➖ -12.8% [-37.9%, +12.2%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/lfds/dglm.c	52.052 ± 3.893 s	49.136 ± 3.733 s	➖ +5.3% [-43.7%, +54.3%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/lfds/ms.c	60.008 ± 7.414 s	62.775 ± 7.317 s	➖ -4.8% [-52.2%, +42.5%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/lfds/treiber.c	18.226 ± 0.650 s	18.005 ± 0.510 s	➖ +1.1% [-22.8%, +25.1%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/lfds/safe_stack.c	9.626 ± 1.247 s	11.188 ± 0.521 s	➖ -17.1% [-73.2%, +39.1%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/challenging/cna.c	40.400 ± 2.177 s	37.524 ± 0.931 s	➖ +7.0% [-22.8%, +36.7%]	UNKNOWN

Memory model: aarch64

Benchmark	Base branch	PR branch	Improvement (99% CI)	Result
benchmarks/locks/linuxrwlock.c	18.738 ± 1.832 s	17.971 ± 1.515 s	➖ +4.0% [-13.0%, +20.9%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/locks/mutex_musl.c	19.164 ± 1.397 s	17.474 ± 1.270 s	➖ +8.8% [-13.1%, +30.6%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/lfds/dglm.c	15.039 ± 2.006 s	15.520 ± 0.298 s	➖ -4.4% [-80.8%, +72.0%]	PASS
benchmarks/lfds/ms.c	12.396 ± 1.104 s	11.432 ± 0.872 s	➖ +7.3% [-56.0%, +70.6%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/challenging/cna.c	38.224 ± 3.798 s	40.920 ± 2.454 s	➖ -8.1% [-101.4%, +85.2%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/challenging/wsq.c	17.221 ± 2.694 s	17.697 ± 2.759 s	➖ -3.0% [-52.9%, +46.9%]	UNKNOWN

Memory model: power

Benchmark	Base branch	PR branch	Improvement (99% CI)	Result
benchmarks/locks/linuxrwlock.c	51.681 ± 0.629 s	50.795 ± 1.826 s	➖ +1.7% [-16.4%, +19.8%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/locks/mutex_musl.c	43.342 ± 2.416 s	41.969 ± 0.887 s	➖ +3.0% [-19.4%, +25.4%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/lfds/dglm.c	9.944 ± 0.738 s	12.052 ± 0.588 s	➖ -21.6% [-80.1%, +36.9%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/lfds/ms.c	55.430 ± 4.976 s	45.083 ± 5.802 s	➖ +18.5% [-34.6%, +71.7%]	UNKNOWN
benchmarks/lfds/treiber.c	22.342 ± 2.789 s	22.643 ± 2.800 s	➖ -1.6% [-46.4%, +43.3%]	UNKNOWN

Total

Benchmarks	Base branch	PR branch	Improvement (99% CI)
All reported benchmarks	545.881 ± 5.442 s	539.906 ± 2.757 s	➖ +1.1% [-7.2%, +9.4%]

[ThomasHaas]

LGTM