Add reverse() to both vectors and masks - #356
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This has better lowerings than swizzle_dyn_precise because we can splt/combine for free to move data across blocks for larger-than-native vectors, e.g. 512-bit vectors on SSE4.2
LaurenzV
approved these changes
Aug 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This deserves its own op because it has better lowerings than
swizzle_dyn: we can splt/combine to move data across blocks for free in larger-than-native vectors, e.g. for 512-bit vectors on SSE4.2.Other than the block split, it just reuses
swizzle_dynunder the hood, so the implementation is generic and pretty clean.Masks also get this op, lowering into either a bitcast into a vector on most backends or into scalar ops on a packed mask on AVX-512.
Matches std::simd API