Skip to content

fix: allow extra fields in responses #110

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
dni merged 2 commits into from
Aug 10, 2026
+3 −3
Merged

fix: allow extra fields in responses #110

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
e893a6c
fix: allow extra fields in responses
dni Aug 10, 2026
0c83209
bump version
dni Aug 10, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion lnurl/models.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ class LnurlResponseModel(BaseModel):

class Config:
use_enum_values = True
extra = "forbid"
extra = "ignore"

def dict(self, **kwargs):
kwargs["exclude_none"] = True
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion pyproject.toml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
[project]
name = "lnurl"
version = "0.10.3"
version = "0.10.4"
requires-python = ">=3.10,<3.13"
description = "LNURL implementation for Python."
authors = [{ name = "Alan Bits", email = "alan@lnbits.com" }]
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion uv.lock
View file
Open in desktop

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

Loading