RFE-9751: Add non-admin backup schedules

[shubham-pampattiwar]

Why the changes were made

Implements RFE-9751 by adding tenant-scoped NonAdminSchedule resources. Each NAS creates a controlled backing Velero Schedule, surfaces each generated Backup as a synchronized NonAdminBackup, preserves the tenant BSL mapping per run, and removes synchronized NABs after their backing Backup expires. The committed design is in docs/design/nonadmin_schedule.md.

How to test the changes made

• GOCACHE=/private/tmp/rfe9751-gocache-elevated GOTMPDIR=/private/tmp/rfe9751-gotmp-elevated go test ./internal/controller -count=1
• GOCACHE=/private/tmp/rfe9751-gocache-elevated GOTMPDIR=/private/tmp/rfe9751-gotmp-elevated go test ./... -run "^TestNonAdminSchedule|^TestNextRun" -count=1
• GOCACHE=/private/tmp/rfe9751-gocache-elevated GOTMPDIR=/private/tmp/rfe9751-gotmp-elevated go vet ./...

[openshift-ci-robot]

@shubham-pampattiwar: This pull request references RFE-9751 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Why the changes were made

Implements RFE-9751 by adding tenant-scoped NonAdminSchedule resources. Each NAS creates a controlled backing Velero Schedule, surfaces each generated Backup as a synchronized NonAdminBackup, preserves the tenant BSL mapping per run, and removes synchronized NABs after their backing Backup expires. The committed design is in docs/design/nonadmin_schedule.md.

How to test the changes made

• GOCACHE=/private/tmp/rfe9751-gocache-elevated GOTMPDIR=/private/tmp/rfe9751-gotmp-elevated go test ./internal/controller -count=1
• GOCACHE=/private/tmp/rfe9751-gocache-elevated GOTMPDIR=/private/tmp/rfe9751-gotmp-elevated go test ./... -run "^TestNonAdminSchedule|^TestNextRun" -count=1
• GOCACHE=/private/tmp/rfe9751-gocache-elevated GOTMPDIR=/private/tmp/rfe9751-gotmp-elevated go vet ./...

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: shubham-pampattiwar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [shubham-pampattiwar]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[coderabbitai]

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

• Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[oadp-snyk]

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status	Scan Engine	Critical	High	Medium	Low	Total (0)
✅	Open Source Security	0	0	0	0	0 issues
✅	Licenses	0	0	0	0	0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.