Skip to content

Fix: assume Move when the move_trait feature is not added - #2

Closed
zannabianca1997 wants to merge 3 commits into
nia-e:move-traitfrom
zannabianca1997:next-solver-assume-move
Closed

Fix: assume Move when the move_trait feature is not added#2
zannabianca1997 wants to merge 3 commits into
nia-e:move-traitfrom
zannabianca1997:next-solver-assume-move

Conversation

@zannabianca1997

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi

Gave a look at the serde build error. Turns out it was the next solver complaining about a missing Move bound

copied over the solution implemented in the old solver: a fast path that skips evaluation when feature(move_trait) is not present, assuming all types are Move.

should fix all issues of the kind

@lcnr

lcnr commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

added it to the PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants