Skip to content

ci(e2e): run e2e on PRs when the "run-e2e" label is added - #1314

Merged
vicb merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
vicb/e2e-pending-status
Oct 22, 2026
Merged

vicb merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
vicb/e2e-pending-status

Conversation

@vicb

@vicb vicb commented Oct 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Add a run-e2e label to trigger the e2e on PRs (simpler than goign to the Actions tab
  • Report start (only the end status was reported before the PR)

@vicb
vicb requested review from conico974 and sommeeeer October 15, 2026 07:19
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: b7c9121

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 45.07% 5309 / 11778
🔵 Statements 45.07% 5309 / 11778
🔵 Functions 68.39% 264 / 386
🔵 Branches 83.38% 1526 / 1830
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #2071 for commit b7c9121 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

@vicb

vicb commented Oct 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@conico974 @sommeeeer can I get a review on this PR?

@vicb
vicb merged commit 66b5529 into main Oct 22, 2026
1 check passed
@vicb
vicb deleted the vicb/e2e-pending-status branch October 22, 2026 07:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants