Skip to content

chore(models): sync Command Code catalog - #151

Closed
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
automation/commandcode-catalog
Closed

github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
automation/commandcode-catalog

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated synchronization with the latest published command-code CLI package.

This updates only machine-readable compatibility metadata:

  • CLI version used in the x-command-code-version header
  • image-input capabilities
  • reasoning capability and selectable effort levels
  • model-specific maximum output limits
  • documented catalog snapshot version

Pricing remains review-only because CLI documentation does not represent every pricing tier and temporary promotion used by the provider.

@karaaslanz karaaslanz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed exact head 6fd67655b518d7b9c12b3cd226d33950a54f7235 as a catalog-only synchronization change.

Independent checks:

  • Downloaded the published command-code@1.81.0 npm tarball; its package manifest confirms version 1.81.0.
  • Inspected the bundled reference/models.md: new meta/muse-wonder-1.0 is present, with low, medium, high, xhigh reasoning effort choices. This matches the new generated effort-map entry.
  • The PR patch updates the README/catalog version together and adds the new model consistently to input modality, reasoning and efforts. Pricing remains review-only as documented.
  • On a clean detached checkout of this exact head, npm run typecheck PASS and git diff --check PASS on Windows.

Limits: I did not run the full suite or a live authenticated model request, so this does not independently prove image support. The hosted workflows show action_required, not green CI. No blocking mismatch was found in the catalog version / effort synchronization reviewed.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Memory benchmark

Compared base b61093d with PR head 6fd6765 on the same GitHub-hosted darwin runner. Lower values are better.

Metric Base PR PR − Base Change
Stable RSS 120.7 MiB ± 0.2 MiB 120.6 MiB ± 0.5 MiB -0.4 MiB ± 0.1 MiB -0.3%
Physical footprint 67.0 MiB ± 0.6 MiB 67.0 MiB ± 0.4 MiB +0.1 MiB ± 0.6 MiB +0.1%
Physical peak 78.1 MiB ± 0.6 MiB 78.0 MiB ± 1.0 MiB +0.4 MiB ± 0.8 MiB +0.5%

Interpretation: Differences larger than their measured MAD: Stable RSS -0.4 MiB ± 0.1 MiB.

Extension overhead above pi baseline

Metric Base overhead PR overhead Difference
Stable RSS +7.1 MiB ± 0.2 MiB +6.7 MiB ± 0.2 MiB -0.4 MiB ± 0.1 MiB
Physical footprint +3.5 MiB ± 1.3 MiB +3.9 MiB ± 1.3 MiB +0.1 MiB ± 0.6 MiB
Physical peak +5.8 MiB ± 1.4 MiB +5.4 MiB ± 1.7 MiB +0.4 MiB ± 0.8 MiB

Values are medians of 6 alternating, paired runs. The value after ± is the median absolute deviation (MAD). Each process was sampled 12 times after a 2500 ms warm-up.

Environment: pi 0.84.4, Bun 1.4.0, darwin arm64. RSS comes from ps; physical footprint and peak come from macOS footprint.

This is a comparative signal, not a pass/fail threshold. GitHub-hosted runner noise can affect absolute values.

@github-actions
github-actions Bot force-pushed the automation/commandcode-catalog branch from 6fd6765 to b5b34e2 Compare October 14, 2026 11:51
@patlux

patlux commented Oct 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Superseded by merged #153, which includes the metadata refresh plus reviewed pricing, updated fixtures, and the CLI 1.82.4 parser fix. The integrated catalog/pricing checks pass for CLI 1.82.4 and all 93 currently advertised API models.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants