Repository navigation
Show which fields have received changes - #55
Open
nathanktruong wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
nathanktruong wants to merge 1 commit into
nathanktruong wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…ome fields omitted bc of false positives
Author
|
to whomever reviews this - there were some additional pieces from self-review that I decided to not include in these changes: 1. some fields don't have their own changed field, such as
|
nathanktruong
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 20, 2026 22:39
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Show which fields have received changes
Problem
As we expect to get an influx of new resources, easing the effort for the reviewers is a priority!
As the ticket mentioned, it's unclear on a skim which resource fields are actually being changed, since proposed edits could be the same or look very similar to whats current. Accidentally approving inaccurate information might lead PHLASK users astray if its taken seriously.
Solution
Adds a table column — that points to the row when current + proposed are fully different values. This means it'll also flag trailing whitespace.
Reference
Addresses #52
Screenshots
Checklist