Bump ruff pre-commit and Python floor, fix PLR0917 lint - #79
Open
rcolfin wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Upgrading ruff to v0.16.3 surfaced a new PLR0917 (too many positional arguments) finding on save(); added it to the existing noqa alongside PLR0913. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds an integration test that drives the "save" CLI command through the full postal -> census -> timezone -> utils.save_frame pipeline, mocking only the USPS/Census HTTP boundaries, to validate the interactions between those modules (including --fill timezone propagation). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
1 similar comment
Contributor
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
pyproject.toml,uv.lock)PLR0917(too many positional arguments) lint finding surfaced by the ruff upgrade, by adding it to the existing noqa onsave()Test plan
uv run pytest— 133 passed🤖 Generated with Claude Code