Skip to content

Rollup of 9 pull requests - #152279

Closed
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 30 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
JonathanBrouwer:rollup-k7uY3Av
Closed

Rollup of 9 pull requests#152279
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 30 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
JonathanBrouwer:rollup-k7uY3Av

Conversation

@JonathanBrouwer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost

Create a similar rollup

tgross35 and others added 30 commits January 26, 2026 13:43
`cold_path` has been around unstably for a while and is a rather useful
tool to have. It does what it is supposed to and there are no known
remaining issues, so stabilize it here (including const).

Newly stable API:

    // in core::hint
    pub const fn cold_path();

I have opted to exclude `likely` and `unlikely` for now since they have
had some concerns about ease of use that `cold_path` doesn't suffer
from. `cold_path` is also significantly more flexible; in addition to
working with boolean `if` conditions, it can be used in `match` arms,
`if let`, closures, and other control flow blocks. `likely` and
`unlikely` are also possible to implement in user code via `cold_path`,
if desired.
and deprecate fetch_update starting 1.99.0
Because `Cache` is unhelpfully vague.
stabilizes `core::range::RangeInclusive`
and `core::range::RangeInclusiveIter`
and the `core::range` module
…jhpratt

Stabilize `atomic_try_update`and deprecate `fetch_update` starting 1.99.0

Tracking issue: rust-lang#135894
FCP completed: rust-lang#135894 (comment)

~1.96.0 was chosen because I don't think the remaining month until 1.93.0 becomes beta is enough for the FCP to finish and this to get merged, so 1.94.0 + a couple of versions of leeway: rust-lang#135894 (comment)

1.99 suggested in rust-lang#148590 (comment)

Closes rust-lang#135894
…, r=tgross35

Stabilize new inclusive range type and iterator type

Part 1 of stabilizing the new range types for rust-lang#125687

stabilizes `core::range::RangeInclusive` and `core::range::RangeInclusiveIter`. Newly stable API:

```rust
// in core and std
pub mod range;

// in core::range

pub struct RangeInclusive<Idx> {
    pub start: Idx,
    pub last: Idx,
}

impl<Idx: fmt::Debug> fmt::Debug for RangeInclusive<Idx> { /* ... */ }

impl<Idx: PartialOrd<Idx>> RangeInclusive<Idx> {
    pub const fn contains<U>(&self, item: &U) -> bool
    where
        Idx: [const] PartialOrd<U>,
        U: ?Sized + [const] PartialOrd<Idx>;

    pub const fn is_empty(&self) -> bool
    where
        Idx: [const] PartialOrd;
}

impl<Idx: Step> RangeInclusive<Idx> {
    pub fn iter(&self) -> RangeInclusiveIter<Idx>;
}

impl<T> const RangeBounds<T> for RangeInclusive<T> { /* ... */ }
impl<T> const RangeBounds<T> for RangeInclusive<&T> { /* ... */ }

impl<T> const From<RangeInclusive<T>> for legacy::RangeInclusive<T> { /* ... */ }
impl<T> const From<legacy::RangeInclusive<T>> for RangeInclusive<T> { /* ... */ }

pub struct RangeInclusiveIter<A>(/* ... */);

impl<A: Step> RangeInclusiveIter<A> {
    pub fn remainder(self) -> Option<RangeInclusive<A>>;
}

impl<A: Step> Iterator for RangeInclusiveIter<A> {
    type Item = A;
    /* ... */
}

impl<A: Step> DoubleEndedIterator for RangeInclusiveIter<A> { /* ... */ }
impl<A: Step> FusedIterator for RangeInclusiveIter<A> { }
impl<A: Step> IntoIterator for RangeInclusive<A> {
    type Item = A;
    type IntoIter = RangeInclusiveIter<A>;
    /* ... */
}

impl ExactSizeIterator for RangeInclusiveIter<u8> { }
impl ExactSizeIterator for RangeInclusiveIter<i8> { }

unsafe impl<T> const SliceIndex<[T]> for range::RangeInclusive<usize> {
    type Output = [T];
    /* ... */
}
unsafe impl const SliceIndex<str> for range::RangeInclusive<usize> {
    type Output = str;
    /* ... */
}
```

I've removed the re-exports temporarily because from what I can tell, there's no way to make re-exports of stable items unstable. They will be added back and stabilized in a separate PR.
…onathanBrouwer

Convert to inline diagnostics in `rustc_parse`

This was the most annoying one by far, had to make a few changes to the representation of two errors (no user-facing changes tho), these changes are in separate commits for clarity :)

For rust-lang#151366
r? @jdonszelmann
…scii, r=dtolnay

feat: Implement `int_from_ascii` for `NonZero<T>`

- Tracking issue: rust-lang#134821

This pull request adds `from_ascii` and `from_ascii_radix` methods to `NonZero<T>` that parses a non-zero integer from an ASCII-byte slice (`&[u8]`) with decimal digits or digits in a given base.

When using the combination of `int::from_ascii` or `int::from_ascii_radix` and `NonZero::<T>::new`, [`IntErrorKind::Zero`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/num/enum.IntErrorKind.html#variant.Zero) cannot be returned as an error.

`NonZero::<T>::from_str_radix` and `NonZero::<T>::from_str` require a string (`&str`) as a parameter.

```rust
// Cannot return `IntErrorKind::Zero` as an error.
assert_eq!(NonZero::new(u8::from_ascii(b"0").unwrap()), None);

// Can return `IntErrorKind::Zero` as an error.
let err = NonZero::<u8>::from_ascii(b"0").unwrap_err();
assert_eq!(err.kind(), &IntErrorKind::Zero);
```

See also rust-lang#152193
…pratt

Stabilize `core::hint::cold_path`

`cold_path` has been around unstably for a while and is a rather useful tool to have. It does what it is supposed to and there are no known remaining issues, so stabilize it here (including const).

Newly stable API:

```rust
// in core::hint
pub const fn cold_path();
```

I have opted to exclude `likely` and `unlikely` for now since they have had some concerns about ease of use that `cold_path` doesn't suffer from. `cold_path` is also significantly more flexible; in addition to working with boolean `if` conditions, it can be used in `match` arms, `if let`, closures, and other control flow blocks. `likely` and `unlikely` are also possible to implement in user code via `cold_path`, if desired.

Closes: rust-lang#136873 (tracking issue)

---

There has been some design and implementation work for making `#[cold]` function in more places, such as `if` arms, `match` arms, and closure bodies. Considering a stable `cold_path` will cover all of these usecases, it does not seem worth pursuing a more powerful `#[cold]` as an alternative way to do the same thing. If the lang team agrees, then:

Closes: rust-lang#26179
Closes: rust-lang#120193
…-lto, r=nnethercote

Linker-plugin-based LTO: give an explanation how to use linker-plugin-lto with full LTO

Closes rust-lang#138910

The existing linker-plugin-based LTO documentation does not describe the correct usage of full LTO. Specifically, when invoking `rustc` with full LTO, the `-C lto` flag must be passed in addition to `-C linker-plugin-lto`.

Also, this PR documents the use of full LTO when linking Rust with Fortran. Unfortunately, LLVM `flang` does not currently support ThinLTO, so full LTO is the only viable option in this case.

Toolchain combinations were slightly updated.

TODO:
- [x] check swiftc compiler. Almost unusable.
- [x] check how std lib is actually compiled
- [x] add note about LLD and bitcode
- [x] report bug to LLVM: llvm/llvm-project#179800

<details>
  <summary>Swiftc is unusable</summary>

https://www.swift.org/install/ gave me LLVM-17. During playing with swift main + rust static library, LLVM-23 removed main :D

```console
# thin LTO Rust:
rustc --crate-type=staticlib -Clinker-plugin-lto -Copt-level=3 ./ftn.rs
# full LTO swift:
swiftc -static libftn.a main.swift -lto=llvm-full -O -use-ld=/tmp/test/llvm-project/install/bin/ld.lld -Xlinker --gc-sections -Xlinker --as-needed -o sr
 ./sr
> ftn() returned: 77
# thin LTO swift:
swiftc -static libftn.a main.swift -lto=llvm-thin -O -use-ld=/tmp/test/llvm-project/install/bin/ld.lld -Xlinker --gc-sections -Xlinker --as-needed -o sr
./sr
> No output
```

</details>
…const-stable-indirect, r=jonathanbrouwer

Port `rustc_intrinsic_const_stable_indirect` and `rustc_intrinsic` to the new attribute parser

r? @JonathanBrouwer
…cache, r=Zalathar

Move `rustc_query_system::cache`.

It only defines two types, `Cache` and `WithDepNode`. Neither has anything much to do with queries -- they use `DepNodeIndex`, that's all.

This commit moves the module into `rustc_middle`, to where they are used. It also renames the extremely non-descriptive `Cache` as `WithDepNodeCache`.

r? @Zalathar
…ouwer

Port some attributes to the attr parser

Tracking issue: rust-lang#131229

r? @JonathanBrouwer
@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Feb 7, 2026
@JonathanBrouwer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@rustbot rustbot added A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs A-tidy Area: The tidy tool A-translation Area: Translation infrastructure, and migrating existing diagnostics to SessionDiagnostic F-explicit_tail_calls `#![feature(explicit_tail_calls)]` PG-exploit-mitigations Project group: Exploit mitigations S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-clippy Relevant to the Clippy team. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 7, 2026
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Feb 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📌 Commit 7d16363 has been approved by JonathanBrouwer

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 7, 2026
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Feb 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #152274) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

This pull request was unapproved.

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Feb 7, 2026
@JonathanBrouwer
JonathanBrouwer deleted the rollup-k7uY3Av branch August 21, 2026 08:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs A-tidy Area: The tidy tool A-translation Area: Translation infrastructure, and migrating existing diagnostics to SessionDiagnostic F-explicit_tail_calls `#![feature(explicit_tail_calls)]` PG-exploit-mitigations Project group: Exploit mitigations rollup A PR which is a rollup T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-clippy Relevant to the Clippy team. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants