Skip to content

fix: accelerate fresh provisioning and trace E2B create stages - #16

Merged
sam2tom merged 2 commits into
betafrom
codex/fresh-runtime-provision-hints
Oct 8, 2026
Merged

sam2tom merged 2 commits into
betafrom
codex/fresh-runtime-provision-hints

Conversation

@sam2tom

@sam2tom sam2tom commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hosted Environments can wait for the next lifecycle scan before allocation. Notify the existing lifecycle owner after Session creation commits, and recover missed notifications when pending input is committed. Placement, lease, capacity, one-shot Create and periodic recovery remain authoritative.

Add six bounded E2B Create stage timings for allocation-level diagnosis, excluding SDK error text, credentials and command output. Fix subprocess output collection so the embedded buffer's ReadFrom cannot bypass the byte limit.

Validation:

  • Database-backed ordinary/stream creation and ordinary/initial input recovery without advancing the maintenance clock, including concurrent retries.
  • Full execution and E2B adapter race tests; focused capacity, ownership, suspension and uncertain-create regressions.
  • 216 Python helper tests; real subprocess logging/overflow tests; independent review with no remaining findings.

No schema or SQL changes. Rebuild Core and its bundled E2B helper together; no Runtime template change is required. The beta integration ledger records these deployment requirements. Production latency improvement requires separate live verification.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-08T07:24:37.149999Z 10c41a9 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 10c41a9ea6

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

| Item | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Fork beta baseline | `ccd9071b93008739d7ddc18c5b24eb45525a005c` |
| Integration branch | `codex/fresh-runtime-provision-hints` |

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Remove integration-branch process history

This row preserves a transient development branch rather than a current deployment requirement, so it becomes stale when that branch is renamed or deleted. Remove it and retain only current release and deployment facts; the repository documentation rules explicitly prohibit process history and task chronology.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L59-L59

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@sam2tom
sam2tom merged commit eb35e9b into beta Oct 8, 2026
41 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant