docs: remove blanket README MIT claim without root LICENSE - #136
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The license section said the repository was MIT while no root LICENSE file is published. Point at the published package manifests and package-level LICENSE files, and state that a root LICENSE is not published.
docs/governance/llms-full.txt is generated from README.md. The documentation release check requires that snapshot to match. This commit is the same sentence the README now uses, written by docs/scripts/render-llms-full.mjs.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
The README section
## License and telemetrysaidMIT License.That line read as a license for the whole repository. This repository does not publish a rootLICENSEfile (contents API 404; the GitHub license field is null).This pull request replaces that line with an observational note. Published packages
@vantio/cli,@vantio/agent-sdk, andvantio-agent-sdkdeclare MIT in their package manifests, and in package-level LICENSE files where those files are present. The new text also states that a repository-root LICENSE is not published.docs/governance/llms-full.txtis generated from the canonical docs, andREADME.mdis the first of those docs. The documentation release check requires that snapshot to match regeneration. The second commit runsnode docs/scripts/render-llms-full.mjsso the same sentence replaces the copiedMIT License.line. No other line in that file changes.No root
LICENSEfile is added. The Founder hold (ROOT_MIT_UNTIL_LEGAL/inventory_only_no_root_MIT) is respected.What stays the same
packages/optics-python-adapterstill declaresLicenseRef-proprietary. No package license field is changed. The telemetry paragraph is unchanged. Package-level MIT declarations for the published packages named above stay as they are.Test plan
README.mdand the generateddocs/governance/llms-full.txtsnapshot onlyLICENSEfile is addednode --test docs/scripts/check-docs-release.test.mjs tests/disclosure-governance-cleanup/direct.test.mjspasses