Spawn arrow conversion in jni bindings#8595
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Robert Kruszewski <github@robertk.io>
Merging this PR will not alter performance
|
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | chunked_bool_canonical_into[(1000, 10)] |
15.9 µs | 26.7 µs | -40.29% |
| ❌ | Simulation | chunked_varbinview_into_canonical[(1000, 10)] |
169.1 µs | 205.8 µs | -17.83% |
| ❌ | Simulation | slice_empty_vortex |
310 ns | 368.3 ns | -15.84% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | chunked_varbinview_canonical_into[(100, 100)] |
259.6 µs | 224.5 µs | +15.65% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128] |
244.4 ns | 215.3 ns | +13.55% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | chunked_varbinview_into_canonical[(100, 100)] |
306.8 µs | 271.9 µs | +12.84% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024] |
304.7 ns | 275.6 ns | +10.58% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing rk/jnispawn (7b63007) with develop (3493ecb)2
Footnotes
-
4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
No successful run was found on
develop(33d6e07) during the generation of this report, so 3493ecb was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩
We want the worker pool to pick it up instead of running on the consuming thread