Expose array buffer replacement

[gatesn]

Rationale for this change

I want to move array buffers between devices, but keep the same array tree.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 10.55%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 6 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 1582 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 4 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	chunked_varbinview_into_canonical[(1000, 10)]	168.8 µs	205.9 µs	-17.98%
⚡	Simulation	copy_nullable[65536]	1.4 ms	1 ms	+32.08%
⚡	Simulation	chunked_varbinview_canonical_into[(100, 100)]	259.6 µs	224.4 µs	+15.68%
⚡	Simulation	bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128]	215.3 ns	186.1 ns	+15.67%
⚡	Simulation	chunked_varbinview_into_canonical[(100, 100)]	306.5 µs	272.1 µs	+12.65%
⚡	Simulation	bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024]	275.6 ns	246.4 ns	+11.84%
⚡	Simulation	eq_i64_constant	318.6 µs	288.3 µs	+10.5%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing ngates/with-buffers (75dfba6) with develop (3451cb0)}

Footnotes

1. 4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩