Skip to content

build(deps): bump github.com/xgo-dev/plan9asm from 0.5.2 to 0.5.3 - #2635

Merged
xushiwei merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/go_modules/github.com/xgo-dev/plan9asm-0.5.3
Sep 21, 2026
Merged

build(deps): bump github.com/xgo-dev/plan9asm from 0.5.2 to 0.5.3#2635
xushiwei merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/go_modules/github.com/xgo-dev/plan9asm-0.5.3

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Sep 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps github.com/xgo-dev/plan9asm from 0.5.2 to 0.5.3.

Release notes

Sourced from github.com/xgo-dev/plan9asm's releases.

v0.5.3

What's Changed

Full Changelog: xgo-dev/plan9asm@v0.5.2...v0.5.3

Commits
  • 010524e Merge pull request #38 from cpunion/codex/reported-library-corpus-20260913
  • c62965b test: persist and expand ecosystem assembly coverage
  • 16c5d20 translator: support x86 forms found in module corpus
  • e42aff9 test: cover discovered scalar validation paths
  • c92ce2e test: discover and pin public assembly modules
  • 3cc0a00 translator: support scalar forms found in module corpus
  • 1cd3721 ci: keep Go caches writable on Qiniu runners
  • 4986dc5 ci: run Linux jobs on Qiniu runners
  • 3f19f1d docs: state LLVM 22 toolchain requirement
  • 13df8b4 test: keep 386 linker on LLVM 22
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot
build(deps): bump github.com/xgo-dev/plan9asm from 0.5.2 to 0.5.3
04abc53 
Bumps [github.com/xgo-dev/plan9asm](https://github.com/xgo-dev/plan9asm) from 0.5.2 to 0.5.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/xgo-dev/plan9asm/releases)
- [Commits](xgo-dev/plan9asm@v0.5.2...v0.5.3)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github.com/xgo-dev/plan9asm
  dependency-version: 0.5.3
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file go Pull requests that update Go code labels Sep 21, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

LLGo baseline benchmarks

04abc532f84f | workflow run | long-term charts

Program measurements

Platform Workload File size vs base Text size vs base Build vs base Run vs base
Linux cprintf 20040 B 0 B / +0.0% 387 B 0 B / +0.0% 511.067 ms +18.46 ms / +3.7% (worse) 1.251 ms -93.35 us / -6.9% (better)
Linux cprintf-lto 19792 B 0 B / +0.0% 368 B 0 B / +0.0% 522.445 ms -5.031 ms / -1.0% (better) 1.315 ms -58.34 us / -4.2% (better)
Linux fmtprintf 1640328 B 0 B / +0.0% 487292 B 0 B / +0.0% 4.017 s -286.3 ms / -6.7% (better) 3.076 ms +33.94 us / +1.1% (worse)
Linux fmtprintf-lto 1478584 B 0 B / +0.0% 422855 B 0 B / +0.0% 11.483 s -244.5 ms / -2.1% (better) 2.920 ms +62.48 us / +2.2% (worse)
Linux println 62160 B 0 B / +0.0% 14647 B 0 B / +0.0% 513.099 ms +9.519 ms / +1.9% (worse) 1.648 ms +3.956 us / +0.2% (worse)
Linux println-lto 54248 B 0 B / +0.0% 12115 B 0 B / +0.0% 742.218 ms +65.21 ms / +9.6% (worse) 1.632 ms +89.75 us / +5.8% (worse)
macOS cprintf 84480 B 0 B / +0.0% 17309 B 0 B / +0.0% 500.474 ms +18.05 ms / +3.7% (worse) 2.206 ms -47.08 us / -2.1% (better)
macOS cprintf-lto 84288 B 0 B / +0.0% 13073 B 0 B / +0.0% 537.143 ms +9.083 ms / +1.7% (worse) 2.275 ms -205.7 us / -8.3% (better)
macOS fmtprintf 1483824 B 0 B / +0.0% 862036 B 0 B / +0.0% 2.653 s +187.4 ms / +7.6% (worse) 4.482 ms +959.4 us / +27.2% (worse)
macOS fmtprintf-lto 1175808 B 0 B / +0.0% 832996 B 0 B / +0.0% 6.544 s -468.2 ms / -6.7% (better) 3.612 ms -905 us / -20.0% (better)
macOS println 114672 B 0 B / +0.0% 34882 B 0 B / +0.0% 506.297 ms +26.87 ms / +5.6% (worse) 2.709 ms -152.2 us / -5.3% (better)
macOS println-lto 118720 B 0 B / +0.0% 32320 B 0 B / +0.0% 637.652 ms +8.599 ms / +1.4% (worse) 4.423 ms +1.562 ms / +54.6% (worse)
Windows MinGW cprintf 19456 B 0 B / +0.0% 4550 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.096 s -16.5 ms / -1.5% (better) 3.520 ms -677 us / -16.1% (better)
Windows MinGW cprintf-lto 17920 B 0 B / +0.0% 4486 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.111 s -17.39 ms / -1.5% (better) 4.258 ms +349.4 us / +8.9% (worse)
Windows MinGW fmtprintf 1913856 B 0 B / +0.0% 589718 B 0 B / +0.0% 4.018 s +62.31 ms / +1.6% (worse) 8.137 ms -993 us / -10.9% (better)
Windows MinGW fmtprintf-lto 1934848 B 0 B / +0.0% 535846 B 0 B / +0.0% 9.426 s -35.12 ms / -0.4% (better) 8.895 ms +512.8 us / +6.1% (worse)
Windows MinGW println 71168 B 0 B / +0.0% 23702 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.052 s -18.31 ms / -1.7% (better) 6.773 ms -184.1 us / -2.6% (better)
Windows MinGW println-lto 65024 B 0 B / +0.0% 20406 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.309 s +32.22 ms / +2.5% (worse) 7.108 ms +122.9 us / +1.8% (worse)
Windows MinGW 386 cprintf 43008 B 0 B / +0.0% 5326 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.166 s +17.39 ms / +1.5% (worse) 5.082 ms +6.6 us / +0.1% (worse)
Windows MinGW 386 cprintf-lto 20992 B 0 B / +0.0% 5094 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.151 s -15.21 ms / -1.3% (better) 5.308 ms +268.7 us / +5.3% (worse)
Windows MinGW 386 fmtprintf 1876992 B 0 B / +0.0% 463342 B 0 B / +0.0% 4.363 s +175.6 ms / +4.2% (worse) 10.897 ms +14.8 us / +0.1% (worse)
Windows MinGW 386 fmtprintf-lto 2152448 B 0 B / +0.0% 440730 B 0 B / +0.0% 9.643 s -3.527 ms / -0.03656% (better) 11.644 ms +1.243 ms / +12.0% (worse)
Windows MinGW 386 println 91136 B 0 B / +0.0% 19814 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.164 s +53.56 ms / +4.8% (worse) 8.555 ms -411.6 us / -4.6% (better)
Windows MinGW 386 println-lto 69120 B 0 B / +0.0% 17742 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.404 s +61.85 ms / +4.6% (worse) 8.958 ms +481.4 us / +5.7% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 cprintf 18944 B 0 B / +0.0% 4408 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.425 s -30.02 ms / -2.1% (better) 6.890 ms +132.9 us / +2.0% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 cprintf-lto 17920 B 0 B / +0.0% 4340 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.449 s -47.87 ms / -3.2% (better) 7.179 ms +369.4 us / +5.4% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 fmtprintf 1801728 B 0 B / +0.0% 502004 B 0 B / +0.0% 4.232 s -220.8 ms / -5.0% (better) 13.081 ms -693.7 us / -5.0% (better)
Windows MinGW ARM64 fmtprintf-lto 1858560 B 0 B / +0.0% 466144 B 0 B / +0.0% 9.540 s -373.7 ms / -3.8% (better) 12.758 ms -2.176 ms / -14.6% (better)
Windows MinGW ARM64 println 68096 B 0 B / +0.0% 22376 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.424 s -14.12 ms / -1.0% (better) 11.833 ms +245.2 us / +2.1% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 println-lto 63488 B 0 B / +0.0% 19444 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.602 s -38.83 ms / -2.4% (better) 11.894 ms -374.9 us / -3.1% (better)
Windows MSVC cprintf 120320 B 0 B / +0.0% 65782 B 0 B / +0.0% 940.241 ms +5.537 ms / +0.6% (worse) 3.290 ms -114.7 us / -3.4% (better)
Windows MSVC cprintf-lto 119808 B 0 B / +0.0% 65718 B 0 B / +0.0% 962.202 ms +2.569 ms / +0.3% (worse) 3.396 ms -13.7 us / -0.4% (better)
Windows MSVC fmtprintf 1628160 B 0 B / +0.0% 685238 B 0 B / +0.0% 3.701 s -99.95 ms / -2.6% (better) 9.916 ms +1.074 ms / +12.1% (worse)
Windows MSVC fmtprintf-lto 1616896 B 0 B / +0.0% 636262 B 0 B / +0.0% 8.901 s +34.08 ms / +0.4% (worse) 9.295 ms +580.5 us / +6.7% (worse)
Windows MSVC println 192512 B 0 B / +0.0% 119126 B 0 B / +0.0% 924.239 ms -12.01 ms / -1.3% (better) 7.178 ms +405.4 us / +6.0% (worse)
Windows MSVC println-lto 189952 B 0 B / +0.0% 116374 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.127 s +1.63 ms / +0.1% (worse) 7.628 ms -1.437 ms / -15.9% (better)
Windows MSVC 386 cprintf 9728 B 0 B / +0.0% 3931 B 0 B / +0.0% 940.315 ms +1.763 ms / +0.2% (worse) 5.874 ms +600.7 us / +11.4% (worse)
Windows MSVC 386 cprintf-lto 9216 B 0 B / +0.0% 3853 B 0 B / +0.0% 968.986 ms +21.03 ms / +2.2% (worse) 6.086 ms +879.9 us / +16.9% (worse)
Windows MSVC 386 fmtprintf 1190400 B 0 B / +0.0% 446693 B 0 B / +0.0% 3.807 s +33.74 ms / +0.9% (worse) 11.662 ms +507.9 us / +4.6% (worse)
Windows MSVC 386 fmtprintf-lto 1224704 B 0 B / +0.0% 417385 B 0 B / +0.0% 8.647 s +57.15 ms / +0.7% (worse) 11.809 ms +548.6 us / +4.9% (worse)
Windows MSVC 386 println 34304 B 0 B / +0.0% 18641 B 0 B / +0.0% 954.784 ms +22.54 ms / +2.4% (worse) 10.172 ms +751.5 us / +8.0% (worse)
Windows MSVC 386 println-lto 32256 B 0 B / +0.0% 16855 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.106 s -151.9 ms / -12.1% (better) 10.008 ms +191.1 us / +1.9% (worse)
Windows MSVC ARM64 cprintf 11264 B 0 B / +0.0% 3976 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.068 s +17.99 ms / +1.7% (worse) 6.380 ms -16.8 us / -0.3% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 cprintf-lto 10752 B 0 B / +0.0% 3868 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.092 s +18.85 ms / +1.8% (worse) 6.620 ms +189.8 us / +3.0% (worse)
Windows MSVC ARM64 fmtprintf 1372672 B 0 B / +0.0% 501636 B 0 B / +0.0% 3.787 s +58.88 ms / +1.6% (worse) 13.315 ms -300 ns / -0.002253% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 fmtprintf-lto 1387520 B 0 B / +0.0% 466564 B 0 B / +0.0% 8.534 s -6.508 ms / -0.1% (better) 13.163 ms -377.7 us / -2.8% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 println 41984 B 0 B / +0.0% 22168 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.058 s +13.14 ms / +1.3% (worse) 11.864 ms +685 us / +6.1% (worse)
Windows MSVC ARM64 println-lto 39424 B 0 B / +0.0% 19356 B 0 B / +0.0% 1.231 s +15.47 ms / +1.3% (worse) 11.252 ms -510.9 us / -4.3% (better)
Core language and compiler benchmarks
Platform Benchmark ns/op vs base
Linux BenchmarkLookupPCRandom 15.170 ns/op -0.53 ns/op / -3.4% (better)
Linux BenchmarkMergeCompilerFlags 205 ns/op -4.5 ns/op / -2.1% (better)
Linux BenchmarkMergeLinkerFlags 148.700 ns/op +13.2 ns/op / +9.7% (worse)
Linux BenchmarkChannelBuffered 55.270 ns/op -0.19 ns/op / -0.3% (better)
Linux BenchmarkChannelHandoff 15102 ns/op +1966 ns/op / +15.0% (worse)
Linux BenchmarkDefer 55.100 ns/op -3.45 ns/op / -5.9% (better)
Linux BenchmarkDirectCall 1.578 ns/op -0.045 ns/op / -2.8% (better)
Linux BenchmarkGlobalRead 1.169 ns/op 0 ns/op / +0.0%
Linux BenchmarkGlobalWrite 7.781 ns/op -0.02 ns/op / -0.3% (better)
Linux BenchmarkGoroutine 22413 ns/op +956 ns/op / +4.5% (worse)
Linux BenchmarkInterfaceCall 6.146 ns/op -0.018 ns/op / -0.3% (better)
Linux BenchmarkRuntimeGetG 2.587 ns/op +0.123 ns/op / +5.0% (worse)
macOS BenchmarkLookupPCRandom 12.280 ns/op +0.09 ns/op / +0.7% (worse)
macOS BenchmarkMergeCompilerFlags 105.900 ns/op +3.2 ns/op / +3.1% (worse)
macOS BenchmarkMergeLinkerFlags 70.570 ns/op +4.68 ns/op / +7.1% (worse)
macOS BenchmarkChannelBuffered 32.510 ns/op +7.04 ns/op / +27.6% (worse)
macOS BenchmarkChannelHandoff 5292 ns/op -4522 ns/op / -46.1% (better)
macOS BenchmarkDefer 43.280 ns/op +9.26 ns/op / +27.2% (worse)
macOS BenchmarkDirectCall 1.208 ns/op +0.14 ns/op / +13.1% (worse)
macOS BenchmarkGlobalRead 1.468 ns/op +0.388 ns/op / +35.9% (worse)
macOS BenchmarkGlobalWrite 1.455 ns/op +0.404 ns/op / +38.4% (worse)
macOS BenchmarkGoroutine 59663 ns/op +33053 ns/op / +124.2% (worse)
macOS BenchmarkInterfaceCall 4.413 ns/op +0.52 ns/op / +13.4% (worse)
macOS BenchmarkRuntimeGetG 2.638 ns/op +0.492 ns/op / +22.9% (worse)
Windows MinGW BenchmarkLookupPCRandom 10.610 ns/op +0.25 ns/op / +2.4% (worse)
Windows MinGW BenchmarkMergeCompilerFlags 512.100 ns/op +8.8 ns/op / +1.7% (worse)
Windows MinGW BenchmarkMergeLinkerFlags 430.300 ns/op -24.1 ns/op / -5.3% (better)
Windows MinGW BenchmarkChannelBuffered 40.130 ns/op -1.07 ns/op / -2.6% (better)
Windows MinGW BenchmarkChannelHandoff 1584 ns/op -56 ns/op / -3.4% (better)
Windows MinGW BenchmarkDefer 58.430 ns/op -5.43 ns/op / -8.5% (better)
Windows MinGW BenchmarkDirectCall 1.128 ns/op -0.036 ns/op / -3.1% (better)
Windows MinGW BenchmarkGlobalRead 0.976 ns/op -0.016 ns/op / -1.6% (better)
Windows MinGW BenchmarkGlobalWrite 7.761 ns/op -0.096 ns/op / -1.2% (better)
Windows MinGW BenchmarkGoroutine 78327 ns/op +97 ns/op / +0.1% (worse)
Windows MinGW BenchmarkInterfaceCall 5.619 ns/op +0.024 ns/op / +0.4% (worse)
Windows MinGW BenchmarkRuntimeGetG 1.265 ns/op -0.026 ns/op / -2.0% (better)
Windows MinGW 386 BenchmarkLookupPCRandom 26.540 ns/op -0.06 ns/op / -0.2% (better)
Windows MinGW 386 BenchmarkMergeCompilerFlags 760.400 ns/op -4.8 ns/op / -0.6% (better)
Windows MinGW 386 BenchmarkMergeLinkerFlags 696.900 ns/op +18.4 ns/op / +2.7% (worse)
Windows MinGW 386 BenchmarkChannelBuffered 40.120 ns/op +0.04 ns/op / +0.1% (worse)
Windows MinGW 386 BenchmarkChannelHandoff 930 ns/op -45.2 ns/op / -4.6% (better)
Windows MinGW 386 BenchmarkDefer 41.680 ns/op -0.1 ns/op / -0.2% (better)
Windows MinGW 386 BenchmarkDirectCall 1.549 ns/op +0.001 ns/op / +0.1% (worse)
Windows MinGW 386 BenchmarkGlobalRead 1.861 ns/op 0 ns/op / +0.0%
Windows MinGW 386 BenchmarkGlobalWrite 7.774 ns/op +0.001 ns/op / +0.01287% (worse)
Windows MinGW 386 BenchmarkGoroutine 85127 ns/op -500 ns/op / -0.6% (better)
Windows MinGW 386 BenchmarkInterfaceCall 8.353 ns/op -0.015 ns/op / -0.2% (better)
Windows MinGW 386 BenchmarkRuntimeGetG 2.166 ns/op -0.002 ns/op / -0.1% (better)
Windows MinGW ARM64 BenchmarkLookupPCRandom 12.080 ns/op +0.08 ns/op / +0.7% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 BenchmarkMergeCompilerFlags 620.500 ns/op +43.9 ns/op / +7.6% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 BenchmarkMergeLinkerFlags 585.100 ns/op +49.6 ns/op / +9.3% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 BenchmarkChannelBuffered 37.550 ns/op -0.13 ns/op / -0.3% (better)
Windows MinGW ARM64 BenchmarkChannelHandoff 2787 ns/op +177 ns/op / +6.8% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 BenchmarkDefer 59.430 ns/op +3.07 ns/op / +5.4% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 BenchmarkDirectCall 0.590 ns/op -0.0001 ns/op / -0.01696% (better)
Windows MinGW ARM64 BenchmarkGlobalRead 0.590 ns/op -0.0004 ns/op / -0.1% (better)
Windows MinGW ARM64 BenchmarkGlobalWrite 0.589 ns/op -0.0004 ns/op / -0.1% (better)
Windows MinGW ARM64 BenchmarkGoroutine 59115 ns/op -3007 ns/op / -4.8% (better)
Windows MinGW ARM64 BenchmarkInterfaceCall 4.143 ns/op -0.001 ns/op / -0.02413% (better)
Windows MinGW ARM64 BenchmarkRuntimeGetG 1.770 ns/op 0 ns/op / +0.0%
Windows MSVC BenchmarkLookupPCRandom 13.020 ns/op -0.08 ns/op / -0.6% (better)
Windows MSVC BenchmarkMergeCompilerFlags 610.600 ns/op -14.7 ns/op / -2.4% (better)
Windows MSVC BenchmarkMergeLinkerFlags 543.700 ns/op -6.2 ns/op / -1.1% (better)
Windows MSVC BenchmarkChannelBuffered 28.250 ns/op +0.08 ns/op / +0.3% (worse)
Windows MSVC BenchmarkChannelHandoff 1156 ns/op +56 ns/op / +5.1% (worse)
Windows MSVC BenchmarkDefer 53.370 ns/op +0.25 ns/op / +0.5% (worse)
Windows MSVC BenchmarkDirectCall 1.548 ns/op +0.001 ns/op / +0.1% (worse)
Windows MSVC BenchmarkGlobalRead 1.549 ns/op 0 ns/op / +0.0%
Windows MSVC BenchmarkGlobalWrite 2.471 ns/op -0.001 ns/op / -0.04045% (better)
Windows MSVC BenchmarkGoroutine 81186 ns/op +585 ns/op / +0.7% (worse)
Windows MSVC BenchmarkInterfaceCall 8.074 ns/op +0.014 ns/op / +0.2% (worse)
Windows MSVC BenchmarkRuntimeGetG 1.861 ns/op +0.005 ns/op / +0.3% (worse)
Windows MSVC 386 BenchmarkLookupPCRandom 26.500 ns/op +0.01 ns/op / +0.03775% (worse)
Windows MSVC 386 BenchmarkMergeCompilerFlags 790.500 ns/op +31.7 ns/op / +4.2% (worse)
Windows MSVC 386 BenchmarkMergeLinkerFlags 695.900 ns/op +3.8 ns/op / +0.5% (worse)
Windows MSVC 386 BenchmarkChannelBuffered 38.960 ns/op -0.08 ns/op / -0.2% (better)
Windows MSVC 386 BenchmarkChannelHandoff 805.500 ns/op -64.5 ns/op / -7.4% (better)
Windows MSVC 386 BenchmarkDefer 44.550 ns/op -0.12 ns/op / -0.3% (better)
Windows MSVC 386 BenchmarkDirectCall 1.549 ns/op +0.003 ns/op / +0.2% (worse)
Windows MSVC 386 BenchmarkGlobalRead 1.550 ns/op 0 ns/op / +0.0%
Windows MSVC 386 BenchmarkGlobalWrite 7.786 ns/op +0.008 ns/op / +0.1% (worse)
Windows MSVC 386 BenchmarkGoroutine 85505 ns/op -2001 ns/op / -2.3% (better)
Windows MSVC 386 BenchmarkInterfaceCall 8.363 ns/op -0.009 ns/op / -0.1% (better)
Windows MSVC 386 BenchmarkRuntimeGetG 2.168 ns/op -0.007 ns/op / -0.3% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 BenchmarkLookupPCRandom 12.020 ns/op -0.05 ns/op / -0.4% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 BenchmarkMergeCompilerFlags 572.400 ns/op +20 ns/op / +3.6% (worse)
Windows MSVC ARM64 BenchmarkMergeLinkerFlags 537.900 ns/op +15.4 ns/op / +2.9% (worse)
Windows MSVC ARM64 BenchmarkChannelBuffered 39.210 ns/op +0.01 ns/op / +0.02551% (worse)
Windows MSVC ARM64 BenchmarkChannelHandoff 3615 ns/op -66 ns/op / -1.8% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 BenchmarkDefer 61.540 ns/op +1.21 ns/op / +2.0% (worse)
Windows MSVC ARM64 BenchmarkDirectCall 0.663 ns/op -0.0003 ns/op / -0.04523% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 BenchmarkGlobalRead 0.590 ns/op +0.0001 ns/op / +0.01696% (worse)
Windows MSVC ARM64 BenchmarkGlobalWrite 3.749 ns/op -0.001 ns/op / -0.02667% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 BenchmarkGoroutine 53287 ns/op -856 ns/op / -1.6% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 BenchmarkInterfaceCall 4.237 ns/op -0.017 ns/op / -0.4% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 BenchmarkRuntimeGetG 1.768 ns/op -0.033 ns/op / -1.8% (better)
Timer runtime benchmarks
Platform Operation and runtime ns/op vs base
Linux AfterFuncZeroDelivery/Go 910.300 ns/op -8 ns/op / -0.9% (better)
Linux AfterFuncZeroDelivery/LLGo 32348 ns/op -968 ns/op / -2.9% (better)
Linux CreateStop/Go 295.200 ns/op -27.7 ns/op / -8.6% (better)
Linux CreateStop/LLGo 1775 ns/op +17 ns/op / +1.0% (worse)
Linux RearmStopped/Go 116 ns/op -1.3 ns/op / -1.1% (better)
Linux RearmStopped/LLGo 1156 ns/op -114 ns/op / -9.0% (better)
Linux ResetActive/Go 69.140 ns/op -0.43 ns/op / -0.6% (better)
Linux ResetActive/LLGo 851.400 ns/op +154.2 ns/op / +22.1% (worse)
Linux ResetHeap1024/Go 67.190 ns/op -0.02 ns/op / -0.02976% (better)
Linux ResetHeap1024/LLGo 183.400 ns/op +3.7 ns/op / +2.1% (worse)
macOS AfterFuncZeroDelivery/Go 462.300 ns/op +35.8 ns/op / +8.4% (worse)
macOS AfterFuncZeroDelivery/LLGo 60509 ns/op -193 ns/op / -0.3% (better)
macOS CreateStop/Go 138 ns/op -5.7 ns/op / -4.0% (better)
macOS CreateStop/LLGo 370.800 ns/op -8.8 ns/op / -2.3% (better)
macOS RearmStopped/Go 58.690 ns/op +1.58 ns/op / +2.8% (worse)
macOS RearmStopped/LLGo 699.600 ns/op +360.4 ns/op / +106.3% (worse)
macOS ResetActive/Go 42.140 ns/op +0.07 ns/op / +0.2% (worse)
macOS ResetActive/LLGo 267.200 ns/op +89.8 ns/op / +50.6% (worse)
macOS ResetHeap1024/Go 45 ns/op +2.83 ns/op / +6.7% (worse)
macOS ResetHeap1024/LLGo 191 ns/op +100.6 ns/op / +111.3% (worse)
Windows MinGW AfterFuncZeroDelivery/Go 649.400 ns/op -6.2 ns/op / -0.9% (better)
Windows MinGW AfterFuncZeroDelivery/LLGo 127948 ns/op +1312 ns/op / +1.0% (worse)
Windows MinGW CreateStop/Go 178.300 ns/op +1.3 ns/op / +0.7% (worse)
Windows MinGW CreateStop/LLGo 949.900 ns/op +217.7 ns/op / +29.7% (worse)
Windows MinGW RearmStopped/Go 66.550 ns/op -0.2 ns/op / -0.3% (better)
Windows MinGW RearmStopped/LLGo 332.400 ns/op +13.2 ns/op / +4.1% (worse)
Windows MinGW ResetActive/Go 29.360 ns/op +0.51 ns/op / +1.8% (worse)
Windows MinGW ResetActive/LLGo 169 ns/op -2.5 ns/op / -1.5% (better)
Windows MinGW ResetHeap1024/Go 29.410 ns/op -0.36 ns/op / -1.2% (better)
Windows MinGW ResetHeap1024/LLGo 116.500 ns/op 0 ns/op / +0.0%
Windows MinGW 386 AfterFuncZeroDelivery/Go 959.700 ns/op +7.2 ns/op / +0.8% (worse)
Windows MinGW 386 AfterFuncZeroDelivery/LLGo 192376 ns/op +7308 ns/op / +3.9% (worse)
Windows MinGW 386 CreateStop/Go 190.800 ns/op -1.2 ns/op / -0.6% (better)
Windows MinGW 386 CreateStop/LLGo 493.900 ns/op -29 ns/op / -5.5% (better)
Windows MinGW 386 RearmStopped/Go 63.160 ns/op -0.02 ns/op / -0.03166% (better)
Windows MinGW 386 RearmStopped/LLGo 352.400 ns/op +0.3 ns/op / +0.1% (worse)
Windows MinGW 386 ResetActive/Go 38.940 ns/op -0.04 ns/op / -0.1% (better)
Windows MinGW 386 ResetActive/LLGo 1016 ns/op +17.1 ns/op / +1.7% (worse)
Windows MinGW 386 ResetHeap1024/Go 39.270 ns/op -0.13 ns/op / -0.3% (better)
Windows MinGW 386 ResetHeap1024/LLGo 186.700 ns/op +1.4 ns/op / +0.8% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 AfterFuncZeroDelivery/Go 679.400 ns/op +12 ns/op / +1.8% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 AfterFuncZeroDelivery/LLGo 129829 ns/op +1068 ns/op / +0.8% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 CreateStop/Go 203.700 ns/op -1.6 ns/op / -0.8% (better)
Windows MinGW ARM64 CreateStop/LLGo 358.200 ns/op -11.7 ns/op / -3.2% (better)
Windows MinGW ARM64 RearmStopped/Go 70.880 ns/op +0.32 ns/op / +0.5% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 RearmStopped/LLGo 254.800 ns/op 0 ns/op / +0.0%
Windows MinGW ARM64 ResetActive/Go 31.210 ns/op +0.08 ns/op / +0.3% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 ResetActive/LLGo 132 ns/op +2.6 ns/op / +2.0% (worse)
Windows MinGW ARM64 ResetHeap1024/Go 31.130 ns/op -0.08 ns/op / -0.3% (better)
Windows MinGW ARM64 ResetHeap1024/LLGo 127.800 ns/op -0.1 ns/op / -0.1% (better)
Windows MSVC AfterFuncZeroDelivery/Go 553.800 ns/op +7.2 ns/op / +1.3% (worse)
Windows MSVC AfterFuncZeroDelivery/LLGo 154410 ns/op -7227 ns/op / -4.5% (better)
Windows MSVC CreateStop/Go 115.900 ns/op -0.8 ns/op / -0.7% (better)
Windows MSVC CreateStop/LLGo 425.300 ns/op -25.3 ns/op / -5.6% (better)
Windows MSVC RearmStopped/Go 31.690 ns/op +0.16 ns/op / +0.5% (worse)
Windows MSVC RearmStopped/LLGo 278.300 ns/op +6.5 ns/op / +2.4% (worse)
Windows MSVC ResetActive/Go 20.090 ns/op -0.02 ns/op / -0.1% (better)
Windows MSVC ResetActive/LLGo 147.500 ns/op -18.1 ns/op / -10.9% (better)
Windows MSVC ResetHeap1024/Go 20.530 ns/op +0.11 ns/op / +0.5% (worse)
Windows MSVC ResetHeap1024/LLGo 125.900 ns/op -1.4 ns/op / -1.1% (better)
Windows MSVC 386 AfterFuncZeroDelivery/Go 943.600 ns/op +0.7 ns/op / +0.1% (worse)
Windows MSVC 386 AfterFuncZeroDelivery/LLGo 183700 ns/op +670 ns/op / +0.4% (worse)
Windows MSVC 386 CreateStop/Go 190.300 ns/op -0.9 ns/op / -0.5% (better)
Windows MSVC 386 CreateStop/LLGo 474.900 ns/op -15.3 ns/op / -3.1% (better)
Windows MSVC 386 RearmStopped/Go 63.260 ns/op -0.04 ns/op / -0.1% (better)
Windows MSVC 386 RearmStopped/LLGo 324.800 ns/op -0.4 ns/op / -0.1% (better)
Windows MSVC 386 ResetActive/Go 39.110 ns/op +0.04 ns/op / +0.1% (worse)
Windows MSVC 386 ResetActive/LLGo 977.300 ns/op -3.9 ns/op / -0.4% (better)
Windows MSVC 386 ResetHeap1024/Go 39.280 ns/op -0.14 ns/op / -0.4% (better)
Windows MSVC 386 ResetHeap1024/LLGo 170.800 ns/op -0.5 ns/op / -0.3% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 AfterFuncZeroDelivery/Go 681 ns/op +10.8 ns/op / +1.6% (worse)
Windows MSVC ARM64 AfterFuncZeroDelivery/LLGo 132292 ns/op -978 ns/op / -0.7% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 CreateStop/Go 205 ns/op +1.7 ns/op / +0.8% (worse)
Windows MSVC ARM64 CreateStop/LLGo 379.300 ns/op +1.7 ns/op / +0.5% (worse)
Windows MSVC ARM64 RearmStopped/Go 70.580 ns/op -0.02 ns/op / -0.02833% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 RearmStopped/LLGo 263.200 ns/op -3.7 ns/op / -1.4% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 ResetActive/Go 30.980 ns/op -0.07 ns/op / -0.2% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 ResetActive/LLGo 132.600 ns/op -6.8 ns/op / -4.9% (better)
Windows MSVC ARM64 ResetHeap1024/Go 31.100 ns/op +0.05 ns/op / +0.2% (worse)
Windows MSVC ARM64 ResetHeap1024/LLGo 136.900 ns/op +0.2 ns/op / +0.1% (worse)

Compared with 943120d1a365 measured in the same runner job.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

LLGo WebAssembly build benchmarks

04abc532f84f | workflow run | long-term charts

WebAssembly output sizes
Example, profile and compiler Wasm module vs base Generated JS glue vs base
cprintf/j32-emscripten/LLGo 135746 B 0 B / +0.0% 70786 B 0 B / +0.0%
cprintf/j32-goos-js/LLGo 133995 B 0 B / +0.0% 69150 B 0 B / +0.0%
cprintf/j64-emscripten-memory64/LLGo 124243 B 0 B / +0.0% 73998 B 0 B / +0.0%
cprintf/w32-goos-wasip1/LLGo 138261 B 0 B / +0.0% 0 B 0 B / 0.0%
cprintf/w32-wasi/LLGo 138265 B 0 B / +0.0% 0 B 0 B / 0.0%
fmtprintf/j32-emscripten/LLGo 3090846 B 0 B / +0.0% 114540 B 0 B / +0.0%
fmtprintf/j32-goos-js/Go 2526852 B 0 B / +0.0% 0 B 0 B / 0.0%
fmtprintf/j32-goos-js/LLGo 3082849 B 0 B / +0.0% 98239 B 0 B / +0.0%
fmtprintf/j64-emscripten-memory64/LLGo 2829305 B 0 B / +0.0% 121521 B 0 B / +0.0%
fmtprintf/w32-goos-wasip1/Go 2500019 B 0 B / +0.0% 0 B 0 B / 0.0%
fmtprintf/w32-goos-wasip1/LLGo 2829104 B 0 B / +0.0% 0 B 0 B / 0.0%
fmtprintf/w32-wasi/LLGo 2697658 B 0 B / +0.0% 0 B 0 B / 0.0%
j32-emscripten/LLGo 135020 B 0 B / +0.0% 70786 B 0 B / +0.0%
j32-goos-js/Go 1895533 B 0 B / +0.0% 0 B 0 B / 0.0%
j32-goos-js/LLGo 133441 B 0 B / +0.0% 69150 B 0 B / +0.0%
j64-emscripten-memory64/LLGo 123573 B 0 B / +0.0% 73998 B 0 B / +0.0%
reflectcall/j32-emscripten/LLGo 1481332 B 0 B / +0.0% 88949 B 0 B / +0.0%
reflectcall/j32-goos-js/Go 2191221 B 0 B / +0.0% 0 B 0 B / 0.0%
reflectcall/j32-goos-js/LLGo 1483040 B 0 B / +0.0% 87313 B 0 B / +0.0%
reflectcall/j64-emscripten-memory64/LLGo 1368320 B 0 B / +0.0% 94158 B 0 B / +0.0%
reflectcall/w32-goos-wasip1/Go 2205707 B 0 B / +0.0% 0 B 0 B / 0.0%
reflectcall/w32-goos-wasip1/LLGo 1534207 B 0 B / +0.0% 0 B 0 B / 0.0%
reflectcall/w32-wasi/LLGo 1460842 B 0 B / +0.0% 0 B 0 B / 0.0%
w32-goos-wasip1/Go 1909947 B 0 B / +0.0% 0 B 0 B / 0.0%
w32-goos-wasip1/LLGo 137550 B 0 B / +0.0% 0 B 0 B / 0.0%
w32-wasi/LLGo 137621 B 0 B / +0.0% 0 B 0 B / 0.0%
LLGo WebAssembly build measurements
Example and profile Build vs base
j32-emscripten 5.898 s -359.2 ms / -5.7% (better)
j32-goos-js 6.204 s -396.6 ms / -6.0% (better)
j64-emscripten-memory64 5.045 s -761 ms / -13.1% (better)
reflectcall/w32-wasi 26.069 s -1.359 s / -5.0% (better)
w32-goos-wasip1 4.650 s +48.24 ms / +1.0% (worse)
w32-wasi 4.508 s -308.2 ms / -6.4% (better)

Compared with 943120d1a365 measured in the same runner job.

@xushiwei
xushiwei merged commit f991ec4 into main Sep 21, 2026
78 of 79 checks passed
@dependabot
dependabot Bot deleted the dependabot/go_modules/github.com/xgo-dev/plan9asm-0.5.3 branch September 21, 2026 06:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file go Pull requests that update Go code

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@xushiwei