You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Eight explainers are still listed as known exceptions in the structure check #1130
Current gap: the structure check lets each of these eight pages lack one thing CONTRIBUTING.md asks of every explainer: a Detection Code section (neural-networks, disparate-impact, fairness-metric-conflicts, shap-values), a Related Concepts section (sampling-bias, which has "Relationship to Other Concepts"), a Concrete Example (differential-privacy), or the standard section order (how-ai-detects-patterns, predictive-parity). The check fails if an exception becomes stale, so each fix also removes its entry.
Suggested approach: fix the pages one by one: add a short runnable detection block with real output to the four that lack it, rename or add the heading where it is only named differently, add a concrete example from one of the audits to differential-privacy, and reorder the two with the wrong order. Use only numbers the code prints, and rebuild.
Done when:KNOWN_EXCEPTIONS is empty (or deleted), make lint passes, and the generated pages are rebuilt.
Activity