Skip to content

test: cover explainer-count checker paths - #1163

Merged
yakew7 merged 1 commit into
yakew7:mainfrom
dxnnystyles:test/issue-1153-explainer-count-coverage
Oct 25, 2026
Merged

yakew7 merged 1 commit into
yakew7:mainfrom
dxnnystyles:test/issue-1153-explainer-count-coverage

Conversation

@dxnnystyles

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

adds temporary-tree tests for stale explainer counts, --fix, missing listings, and all seven count patterns. raises checker coverage from 61.4035% (35/57) to 98.2456% (56/57).

Type

  • Audit
  • Explainer
  • Bug fix
  • Other (tests)

How I Tested

Linked issue

Closes #1153

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Oct 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dxnnystyles is attempting to deploy a commit to the yashkewlani2020-gmailcom's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@yakew7 @ahmdkaml - new PR touching a path you own, please review.

@yakew7
yakew7 merged commit b3dcdc4 into yakew7:main Oct 25, 2026
18 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

check_explainer_count.py is at 61% coverage

2 participants