Added support for Storage Subsystem APIs (3) - #2254
Conversation
|
coverage: 79.322% (+0.3%) from 78.991% — storagesubsystem into master |
andy-maier
left a comment
andy-maier
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The PR contains both storage site and storage subsystem, and given the 8 commits it is hard to find out what belongs to storage subsystem.
If you need storage site as a basis for storage subsystem, then please squash each of them into a single commit. I.e. you first suqash the 4 commits in PR #2206 into a single one, and then rebase this PR on that PR and squash the remaining commits of this PR into a single one, so that the resulting PR has two commits.
If you do not need storage site as a basis, then simply remove its commits from this PR and squash the remaining commits into a single one.
1d246e5 to
7c0574c
Compare
andy-maier
left a comment
andy-maier
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please rebase the PR on the latest master and resolve the merge conflicts.
andy-maier
changed the title
andy-maier
changed the title
|
Please rebase this PR to the latest master, squash the commits into a single one, and resolve the merge conflicts. |
7c0574c to
6cd1507
Compare
Signed-off-by: Vonteddu Chaithra <Vonteddu.Chaithra1@ibm.com>
6cd1507 to
0e09895
Compare
3 participants
No description provided.