Repository navigation
review and improve sustainability chapter - #26
Conversation
gperu
left a comment
gperu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good addition — the practice matrix is a clear way to operationalise "good enough," and the tier names (Analysis Code / Prototype Tools / Research Software Infrastructure) match the terminology PR #30 introduces for the Three-Tiers View, so the two read consistently if merged together.
One nit: **Citation*:** under "Archival:" has a stray asterisk — should be **Citation:**.
No other concerns — happy to merge once that's fixed.
Fix typo in Citation*
|
Thanks @gperu |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟢 Approval recommended
The documentation-only changes have two minor accuracy clarifications remaining, neither of which blocks approval.
2 open issues
What changed in this PR
Updates the sustainability chapter for issue #9 with guidance tailored to research software’s lifespan and audience.
Changes:
- Adds a tiered sustainability practice matrix.
- Expands maintenance, dependency, archival, and governance definitions.
- Adds archival, citation, and CI/CD tool examples.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| source/02-framework/sustainability.md | Expands sustainability practices and supporting tool guidance. |
Review effort: Balanced
Updated the recommendations for environment and dependency management in the sustainability framework. Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Updated links for Software Heritage and Zenodo integrations. Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@copilot fix the failing PDF build |
Co-authored-by: vuillaut <4263646+vuillaut@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixed by loading LaTeX’s |
fixes #9