Repository navigation
Conversation
Maintainer decision (#71): the gate consumes AVE records at schema 1.1.0, published by the independent AVE project. AVE never published 1.2: all 87 records are 1.1.0, provenance_vector and trifecta_profile are optional 1.1.0 fields in different shapes, and capability_mitigation is not in AVE. Section 9 now states what the gate reads, by reference to the AVE schema, and that mitigation stanzas live in gate's own mitigations map, which harden --ave already reads. The mapping from AVE entry_class tokens to gate provenance classes is an open question in Section 12. 9.2 is marked superseded with what happened. Header and 6.2 follow. DESIGN.md only. The code change is #75. Closes #74 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: chaksaray <chaksaray@gmail.com>
This was referenced Oct 20, 2026
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #74
What and why
Maintainer decision in #71: the gate targets AVE schema 1.1.0. DESIGN.md 9 specified an AVE 1.2 that AVE never published.
Measured, aveproject/ave main and gate origin/develop, 2026-10-18/19:
Changes, DESIGN.md only:
data.avecites IDs whose mitigation stanza produced the blocking rule (Section 9.1)schemas/bawbel-ave-mitigations-v1.json; the gate does not consumeprovenance_vectorortrifecta_profileat runtimeave.bawbel.iostring in the repoentry_classtokens map to gate provenance classes. Not specified here, on purpose: that mapping is a design choice, not a factNot changed: Section 11 still cites
BAWBEL_GATE_MITIGATIONS_SPEC.mdSection 3, which is gitignored (.gitignore:2) and so not in the repository.Governing spec
DESIGN.md section(s): header, 6.2, 9 (rewritten), 9.2 (superseded), 12.
Output contract
Verification
Checklist
git commit -s)🤖 Generated with Claude Code