refactor: remove unused ErrorType enum (#670)

[Jamie-BitFlight]

Removes src/errors/error-type.ts, which has no known production consumers and is not part of the published root declarations. Retains the active ConfigKeys and LogGroup enums; enum-to-object conversion is not justified. Draft pending a full reference scan and CI verification. Related #670.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 59 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Repository: bitflight-devops/github-action-readme-generator/.coderabbit.yaml
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 46a8b774-441e-4478-8621-1aa95692e74a

---

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between edb05b4 and 5e9de5d.

---

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/errors/error-type.ts

---

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

Coverage Report

Status	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🔵	Lines	92.65%	1009 / 1089
🔵	Statements	92.79%	1031 / 1111
🔵	Functions	95.62%	153 / 160
🔵	Branches	85.84%	552 / 643

File Coverage

No changed files found.

Generated in workflow #1067 for commit 5e9de5d by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

[github-actions]

Coverage Report

Status	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🔵	Lines	92.65%	1009 / 1089
🔵	Statements	92.79%	1031 / 1111
🔵	Functions	95.62%	153 / 160
🔵	Branches	85.84%	552 / 643

File Coverage

No changed files found.

Generated in workflow #1067 for commit 5e9de5d by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-10T21:15:17.591840Z	5e9de5d	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[Jamie-BitFlight]

Holistic review of PRs #717–#728

Reviewed 5e9de5dfb9efe539665563d0e9a8ac2af4919e9e against main at edb05b4eeea35e03df75b066b8ddd1d708de9f1c.

Assessment: necessary dead-code deletion; ready for final verification. No actionable defect found.

I checked source, tests, documentation, entry points, package exports, and tracked distribution declarations. ErrorType is referenced only by the deleted declaration; the supported package root exports generateReadme, and there is no supported subpath exposing this enum. No caller or meaningful test owner is left behind.

Deletion addresses the stale item in #670 more simply than replacing an unused enum with a new object. It does not imply that the actively used ConfigKeys or LogGroup enums should also change. A keyword-absence test would not establish any user-facing contract and is not recommended.

Current-head Node 24/26, lint and both real-repository integration checks are successful. This PR is independent of the error and logger stacks.

[Jamie-BitFlight]

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.0.5 🎉

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀