Skip to content

fix(generator): enforce generic schema type contracts - #235

Merged
leoafarias merged 2 commits into
fix/2.0-generator-name-contractsfrom
fix/2.0-generator-generic-contracts
Oct 27, 2026
Merged

leoafarias merged 2 commits into
fix/2.0-generator-name-contractsfrom
fix/2.0-generator-generic-contracts

Conversation

@leoafarias

@leoafarias leoafarias commented Oct 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

The generator treated Box<String?> and Box<String> as interchangeable, which could cause runtime casts to fail. It also rejected valid recursive generic bounds.

  • Preserve nullability inside application-defined generic types when choosing a schema.
  • Resolve method type arguments before checking bounds such as T extends Comparable<T>.

Validation

  • Five focused regressions and generated-code build, analysis, runtime, and rebuild checks passed.
  • Compatibility with the declared analyzer 13.0.0 minimum was verified.

@leoafarias
leoafarias marked this pull request as ready for review October 26, 2026 16:17
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T00:01:42.207509Z 0232b67 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@leoafarias
leoafarias added this pull request to stack #238 October 26, 2026 16:30
@leoafarias
leoafarias merged commit d3680b6 into release/2.0 Oct 27, 2026
7 checks passed
@leoafarias
leoafarias deleted the fix/2.0-generator-generic-contracts branch October 27, 2026 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant