Skip to content

fix: preserve original file read errors (#670) - #722

Merged
Jamie-BitFlight merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/670-preserve-file-error-causes
Oct 10, 2026
Merged

Jamie-BitFlight merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/670-preserve-file-error-causes

Conversation

@Jamie-BitFlight

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preserve cause when readFile() adds filename context to filesystem errors. This is independent of the metadata-load wrapper in PR #720. Draft pending regression test and CI verification. Related #670.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 59 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Repository: bitflight-devops/github-action-readme-generator/.coderabbit.yaml
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 033cf479-5898-4eda-bc52-1b4428ce9fcf

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between edb05b4 and 0c881ea.


📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/helpers.ts

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 92.14% 1009 / 1095
🔵 Statements 92.3% 1031 / 1117
🔵 Functions 95.03% 153 / 161
🔵 Branches 85.84% 552 / 643
File Coverage
File Stmts Branches Functions Lines Uncovered Lines
Changed Files
src/helpers.ts 90.86% 84.21% 91.66% 90.73% 126, 135, 277, 297-314, 338, 456-457, 475-476, 555-556, 597-598
Generated in workflow #1070 for commit 0c881ea by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

@Jamie-BitFlight
Jamie-BitFlight marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2026 21:13
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-10T21:15:16.635092Z 0c881ea Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@Jamie-BitFlight Jamie-BitFlight left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Holistic review of PRs #717–#728

Reviewed 0c881eaaeba6a89253a31fd1e3834355df147d3b against main at edb05b4eeea35e03df75b066b8ddd1d708de9f1c.

Assessment: correct narrow error-semantic improvement; ready for final verification. No blocking defect found.

A native ENOENT probe verified that the existing contextual wrapper now preserves the exact original error object, including its code and path, as cause; the public message is unchanged. This is distinct from #720's action-metadata loader and #718's requested persistence path, so it is not redundant with either.

The current callers of this helper are repository-discovery probes. They deliberately catch failed candidates and continue; later string logging or the final generic discovery error still does not expose the cause chain. Consequently, this PR improves the wrapper but does not by itself complete end-to-end diagnostics. Making these fallback probes fatal just to expose a cause would change the existing contract and is not recommended.

Current-head Node 24/26 and both rebuilt third-party integration jobs are green (Node 24). No shared error framework or additional abstraction is needed.

@Jamie-BitFlight
Jamie-BitFlight merged commit 05553e0 into main Oct 10, 2026
11 checks passed
@Jamie-BitFlight
Jamie-BitFlight deleted the fix/670-preserve-file-error-causes branch October 10, 2026 23:11
Jamie-BitFlight pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2026
## [2.0.5](v2.0.4...v2.0.5) (2026-10-11)

### Bug Fixes

* add CLI-only generation error boundary ([#654](#654)) ([#725](#725)) ([6a27eaa](6a27eaa))
* **ci:** honor explicit Node versions before automatic detection ([95a9e68](95a9e68))
* **ci:** honor explicit Node versions in the test matrix ([#735](#735)) ([3f03f0d](3f03f0d))
* complete SVG writes before reporting success ([#717](#717)) ([170e499](170e499))
* consistently interpret GitHub Actions environment flag ([#670](#670)) ([#723](#723)) ([68756ad](68756ad))
* fail generation on formatting and requested save errors ([#654](#654)) ([#718](#718)) ([bb48434](bb48434))
* guard malformed runs metadata and preserve load error causes ([#720](#720)) ([c6caf7a](c6caf7a))
* load native ESM configuration and verify fresh package entry points ([5f92784](5f92784))
* load native ESM configuration and verify fresh package entry points ([#733](#733)) ([55746ed](55746ed))
* pair section log groups and honor Actions mode at output boundaries ([2d45100](2d45100))
* pair section log groups and honor Actions output mode ([#734](#734)) ([ceaa03a](ceaa03a))
* preserve empty metadata descriptions and cover reviewed errors ([3c0a181](3c0a181))
* preserve empty metadata descriptions and verify reviewed error paths ([#732](#732)) ([f8c0f4e](f8c0f4e))
* preserve original file read error as cause ([#722](#722)) ([05553e0](05553e0))
* validate consumed nested metadata descriptions ([#670](#670)) ([#729](#729)) ([330ab9a](330ab9a))
* validate README section configuration at input boundary ([#670](#670)) ([#726](#726)) ([40c9efd](40c9efd))
* verify declared defaults using their rendered projection ([beb2180](beb2180))
* verify empty metadata descriptions through the contract checker ([a5e2d31](a5e2d31))
@Jamie-BitFlight

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.0.5 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@Jamie-BitFlight Jamie-BitFlight added the released This issue/pull request has been released. label Oct 11, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

released This issue/pull request has been released.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant